Episode 37 – Get your priorities straight!

In which we talk about wants vs needs, and the subjective nature of priorities and values.
Recorded April 17, 2025.

Please continue the conversation with us! 
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@doyouhaveaminutepodcast/videos
Email: doyouhaveaminuteconversations@gmail.com
Voicemail: (720)-853-4735

Show notes and links:
Idiom – talk to the hand ✋ – YouTube

Leave a comment

Transcript:

Jump to end
00:00:12.970 –> 00:00:15.509
If you have the wrong wants and needs, it’s because

00:00:15.509 –> 00:00:19.329
you’re valuing something incorrectly. And now

00:00:19.329 –> 00:00:22.170
my persuasion is to help you see the value from

00:00:22.170 –> 00:00:24.489
this different perspective. So you’ve got to

00:00:24.489 –> 00:00:26.350
step away from what you’re thinking, because

00:00:26.350 –> 00:00:28.969
what you’re thinking is wrong. That value is

00:00:28.969 –> 00:00:32.869
incorrect. This value is more valid. And so let

00:00:32.869 –> 00:00:35.729
me help persuade you by protesting, by writing

00:00:35.729 –> 00:00:39.030
this sign that says whatever it says, to help

00:00:39.030 –> 00:00:41.509
convince someone on the street that sees it.

00:00:42.520 –> 00:00:54.700
there’s a higher value here [intro] so let us begin i’m

00:00:54.700 –> 00:00:57.340
uh introducing you or bringing you into a conversation

00:00:57.340 –> 00:01:00.659
in this do you have a minute podcast and we welcome

00:01:00.659 –> 00:01:05.260
all of you to in joining us where i speak with

00:01:05.260 –> 00:01:09.060
my daughter and we have these uh in -depth dives

00:01:09.060 –> 00:01:12.959
into topics and ideas the topic today The idea

00:01:12.959 –> 00:01:16.459
we’d like to discuss is needs and wants, desires,

00:01:16.640 –> 00:01:20.519
and everything. Wants would be the primary word.

00:01:20.760 –> 00:01:24.879
What do you want? I want to finish this conversation.

00:01:25.159 –> 00:01:28.700
Just kidding. We want to be done. Okay, so there’s

00:01:28.700 –> 00:01:31.239
a want. You have certain time demands in your

00:01:31.239 –> 00:01:33.519
wants. Why would you start something if you didn’t

00:01:33.519 –> 00:01:36.519
want to finish it at some point, right? I don’t

00:01:36.519 –> 00:01:40.459
know. Yeah. Maybe not. We want to finish this

00:01:40.459 –> 00:01:43.640
conversation, but we have realistic, you realize

00:01:43.640 –> 00:01:46.480
what’s around that. So that’s a great example.

00:01:46.980 –> 00:01:49.420
We know we’re going to finish this in two hours.

00:01:50.180 –> 00:01:52.260
Approximately, yeah. Might take longer. We want

00:01:52.260 –> 00:01:54.019
to be done. We want to move to the next thing.

00:01:54.079 –> 00:01:57.379
And we maybe want so much to be done that we’re

00:01:57.379 –> 00:01:59.480
working on other things while we’re doing this.

00:02:01.459 –> 00:02:05.180
Appropriately? Yes. Because you want something

00:02:05.180 –> 00:02:07.900
else, too. You want to finish that. item you’re

00:02:07.900 –> 00:02:10.280
working on. Yes. I’m knitting something and I

00:02:10.280 –> 00:02:12.379
do want to finish it. And the only way I’m going

00:02:12.379 –> 00:02:14.699
to finish it is if I work on it when I’m doing

00:02:14.699 –> 00:02:19.460
other things. Nobody sits down to knit and only

00:02:19.460 –> 00:02:25.180
knit. Never happens. Okay. That’s like all of

00:02:25.180 –> 00:02:26.879
you others that are listening to this podcast.

00:02:27.219 –> 00:02:28.819
You’re not just sitting here listening to this

00:02:28.819 –> 00:02:31.520
podcast. You’re doing other things. Likely. Yeah.

00:02:32.580 –> 00:02:36.400
You want to listen to it, but in order to do

00:02:36.400 –> 00:02:39.509
it, So when you want something, how do we identify

00:02:39.509 –> 00:02:44.030
that? Like, what do you mean when you want something?

00:02:44.590 –> 00:02:48.210
Are we trying to define what a want is? Yeah.

00:02:48.330 –> 00:02:52.030
What is want? It’s a desire. Do you want something

00:02:52.030 –> 00:02:55.669
to do? If there’s something missing, if there’s

00:02:55.669 –> 00:02:58.310
something missing, then that thing is wanted.

00:02:58.710 –> 00:03:02.150
Maybe. For want of something is how they say.

00:03:02.449 –> 00:03:04.990
Or an experience was left wanting. It’s missing

00:03:04.990 –> 00:03:09.379
or it’s… That you didn’t enjoy the full benefit

00:03:09.379 –> 00:03:12.639
of the experience was left wanting. If you’re

00:03:12.639 –> 00:03:14.240
in want of something, it means you don’t have

00:03:14.240 –> 00:03:17.699
it right now. You want it. And sometimes you

00:03:17.699 –> 00:03:20.699
have something, but you want more of it. You

00:03:20.699 –> 00:03:22.819
still want it. I have it, but I still want it.

00:03:22.939 –> 00:03:24.819
Yeah, I want it. So I’m going to keep it. I want

00:03:24.819 –> 00:03:28.860
it more. Or, yeah, I’m going to keep it. I want

00:03:28.860 –> 00:03:33.319
my dogs. If I didn’t want them, I’d probably

00:03:33.319 –> 00:03:35.919
get rid of them. I have them and I continue to

00:03:35.919 –> 00:03:38.500
want them. You keep the things you continue to

00:03:38.500 –> 00:03:41.740
want. Yeah. So you’re talking about wants. Wants

00:03:41.740 –> 00:03:44.259
are, it’s a fairly simple word. Does it have

00:03:44.259 –> 00:03:47.280
any bigger meaning to it? That’s what I’m trying

00:03:47.280 –> 00:03:50.360
to see. And the bigger meaning is it’s what you

00:03:50.360 –> 00:03:53.699
hold. Your priorities. So is want a priority?

00:03:54.099 –> 00:03:59.180
I think it’s a part of having priorities. I don’t

00:03:59.180 –> 00:04:03.560
want. I don’t want any more dresses than what

00:04:03.560 –> 00:04:07.800
is in my closet because I have enough and my

00:04:07.800 –> 00:04:11.020
priorities in my life don’t necessitate more

00:04:11.020 –> 00:04:14.199
than what I’ve got. You have sufficient. Yes.

00:04:14.439 –> 00:04:18.100
So you want them. You still want that. I want

00:04:18.100 –> 00:04:20.339
the ones that I have. I just don’t want more

00:04:20.339 –> 00:04:22.740
than that. You have sufficient amount. Yeah.

00:04:22.980 –> 00:04:26.980
You don’t want another. You don’t want more.

00:04:27.259 –> 00:04:30.290
Yes. You do want them because they’re sufficient.

00:04:30.430 –> 00:04:33.170
So there’s a delineation to what your wants are.

00:04:33.290 –> 00:04:36.269
You don’t have an unlimited want for something.

00:04:36.350 –> 00:04:39.449
You limit your wants. Yeah, my wants are limited.

00:04:39.750 –> 00:04:42.110
I don’t want more than the dogs that I have.

00:04:43.470 –> 00:04:47.430
Yeah, you don’t want six or seven. No, I just

00:04:47.430 –> 00:04:51.370
want these two. And then you have that cat that

00:04:51.370 –> 00:04:54.730
serves as a dog as well. Practically. Do you

00:04:54.730 –> 00:04:58.689
want more cats? I don’t want more cats, but other

00:04:58.689 –> 00:05:02.649
people in my house do. And so I want them to

00:05:02.649 –> 00:05:06.870
be happy and fulfilled. And I wonder if weddings…

00:05:06.870 –> 00:05:10.149
If you could potentially want another cat. Yeah,

00:05:10.269 –> 00:05:13.410
in a roundabout way. I wouldn’t want the cat.

00:05:13.529 –> 00:05:16.970
I would want what happens because of the cat.

00:05:17.370 –> 00:05:21.430
Because the cat shows up. The enjoyment of someone

00:05:21.430 –> 00:05:23.910
else, someone else’s want, you would prioritize.

00:05:24.490 –> 00:05:27.560
Yeah. So you can prioritize people’s wants. Now,

00:05:27.579 –> 00:05:32.339
if I didn’t want a cat, if I wanted no cat, no

00:05:32.339 –> 00:05:34.839
more cats. Correct. That would be… Like say

00:05:34.839 –> 00:05:37.860
that it’s in my house and I want no cats. Yeah,

00:05:37.879 –> 00:05:40.480
that would be different. I wouldn’t prioritize

00:05:40.480 –> 00:05:45.079
their wants over my want for no cat. Of no cat.

00:05:45.339 –> 00:05:48.959
Okay. How strong are wants? You can prioritize

00:05:48.959 –> 00:05:51.819
it, but they have a strength too. They have an

00:05:51.819 –> 00:05:58.990
order of… They’re on a spectrum of weak to

00:05:58.990 –> 00:06:03.230
strong. A value spectrum. Yeah. So if you have

00:06:03.230 –> 00:06:06.949
a very strong value that you want chocolate in

00:06:06.949 –> 00:06:09.790
your house and you need chocolate milk and chocolate

00:06:09.790 –> 00:06:13.350
cookies and chocolate chips, what do you call

00:06:13.350 –> 00:06:16.189
that? If you desire a certain type of food, it’s

00:06:16.189 –> 00:06:21.449
a what? It’s a… A hankering for something.

00:06:21.589 –> 00:06:24.370
It’s not that, though. It’s… Hankering. What

00:06:24.370 –> 00:06:26.870
is it? What is it when you’re… It’s not an

00:06:26.870 –> 00:06:29.829
addiction. It’s not. There’s a word. A craving.

00:06:29.930 –> 00:06:32.790
Yeah. That’s what they call it. Yeah. If you

00:06:32.790 –> 00:06:35.189
have a craving for something, and that’s fleeting.

00:06:35.310 –> 00:06:37.670
Your want can be fleeting. It can change. You

00:06:37.670 –> 00:06:41.769
know, today I’m craving salmon. Yeah. Oh, yesterday

00:06:41.769 –> 00:06:46.389
I was craving pickle spears, but the ones that

00:06:46.389 –> 00:06:51.180
we have were spicy. I’m thinking some crazy flavor.

00:06:51.220 –> 00:06:53.439
They called them zesty on the jar. I think we

00:06:53.439 –> 00:06:55.939
got the wrong kind. They were zesty pickle spears.

00:06:55.939 –> 00:06:59.000
And I’m like, I actually don’t want this anymore.

00:07:00.379 –> 00:07:03.860
That ruins it for the dill pickle flavor. Yeah.

00:07:04.399 –> 00:07:06.540
So you wanted something, but it wasn’t exactly

00:07:06.540 –> 00:07:08.579
what you wanted. I thought that I had. Those

00:07:08.579 –> 00:07:12.680
people who love the zest. And that’s a new word

00:07:12.680 –> 00:07:15.329
that’s come out. I’ve learned that I don’t want

00:07:15.329 –> 00:07:17.389
anything that has the word zesty on it. Really?

00:07:17.990 –> 00:07:21.629
Because it actually means spicy? It means spicy.

00:07:21.829 –> 00:07:24.949
It means hot. You’ve got some hot in there. It’s

00:07:24.949 –> 00:07:28.290
like zesty ranch is not ranch dressing. It’s

00:07:28.290 –> 00:07:33.449
not. It’s spicy dressing. Zesty ranch. That’s

00:07:33.449 –> 00:07:38.550
how it caught me that one time. I went to get

00:07:38.550 –> 00:07:42.470
some Thai food with a sister and her husband.

00:07:43.209 –> 00:07:46.449
over the weekend. We got some curry and whatever.

00:07:46.930 –> 00:07:50.709
My favorite Thai food is yellow curry. It’s not

00:07:50.709 –> 00:07:53.670
spicy. Well, I mean, maybe it has just a teeny

00:07:53.670 –> 00:07:56.829
bit of spice, but it’s delicious. Anyway, but

00:07:56.829 –> 00:08:02.290
my sister, she got the level 10 spicy noodles,

00:08:02.610 –> 00:08:05.750
like rice noodles with, I don’t even know what

00:08:05.750 –> 00:08:07.589
it’s called, but she got the spiciest they could

00:08:07.589 –> 00:08:09.970
give her. And everybody at the table was like,

00:08:10.360 –> 00:08:12.480
you really, really want to do this? And she’s

00:08:12.480 –> 00:08:14.379
like, yeah, yeah, this is exactly what I want.

00:08:14.800 –> 00:08:18.420
And even the waitress was like, really, really

00:08:18.420 –> 00:08:23.379
level 10. So she got it and she was eating it

00:08:23.379 –> 00:08:27.660
and she was totally fine. Like nothing. It was

00:08:27.660 –> 00:08:30.019
okay. I had a bite of it because I was like,

00:08:30.060 –> 00:08:32.000
well, it can’t be that spicy if it’s not affecting

00:08:32.000 –> 00:08:35.779
you at all. And it killed me. My face was on

00:08:35.779 –> 00:08:39.399
fire. I think my tongue. So you don’t want that

00:08:39.399 –> 00:08:41.799
either. My tongue was hurting for like three

00:08:41.799 –> 00:08:45.179
days after. Yeah, I don’t want that. No spice.

00:08:45.320 –> 00:08:49.720
I did experience that once at a Chinese food

00:08:49.720 –> 00:08:53.320
place, the mustard, the hot mustard. We were

00:08:53.320 –> 00:08:55.440
having pork and seeds. And so I just, we were

00:08:55.440 –> 00:08:57.529
there with another couple. But I just dipped

00:08:57.529 –> 00:08:59.409
it in a hot mustard and I took more hot mustard

00:08:59.409 –> 00:09:01.590
than I usually did. But I just put it in my mouth

00:09:01.590 –> 00:09:05.909
and my whole head turned hot. Your ears. Went

00:09:05.909 –> 00:09:07.610
from my mouth all the way to the top of my head.

00:09:07.629 –> 00:09:10.649
My ears and top of my head. I said, this is weird.

00:09:10.809 –> 00:09:13.649
I never felt that before, but that’s why I don’t

00:09:13.649 –> 00:09:17.509
want hot stuff. And I put way too much mustard.

00:09:17.690 –> 00:09:22.289
Don’t do that. And so I drank a lot of the drink

00:09:22.289 –> 00:09:25.610
and ate another, you know, crackers or whatever

00:09:25.610 –> 00:09:30.409
it was to. calm that. So wants are on a spectrum

00:09:30.409 –> 00:09:33.090
of value. You value them. You have a higher value

00:09:33.090 –> 00:09:34.850
or lower value to be wants. Do you think that

00:09:34.850 –> 00:09:37.950
you could just not want something that you wanted

00:09:37.950 –> 00:09:40.110
before? Like you make a decision not to want

00:09:40.110 –> 00:09:43.090
something anymore? Yeah, definitely. I mean,

00:09:43.090 –> 00:09:45.610
if you can make a decision to think about something

00:09:45.610 –> 00:09:48.029
differently, that’s essentially the same thing.

00:09:48.429 –> 00:09:52.909
And let me use that idea of cats. I don’t necessarily

00:09:52.909 –> 00:09:56.750
don’t want cats in my house. My wife does not

00:09:56.750 –> 00:09:59.470
want cat. Yeah. You had a farm cat. That’s probably

00:09:59.470 –> 00:10:01.950
a higher value. That’s probably a higher value

00:10:01.950 –> 00:10:06.490
for her than for me. And I don’t have any internal

00:10:06.490 –> 00:10:11.990
drive to not or to do have cats or dogs. I could

00:10:11.990 –> 00:10:14.429
have a dog or I could not have a dog. I’m okay.

00:10:14.950 –> 00:10:18.710
Either way. Your wants, I think, can be described

00:10:18.710 –> 00:10:21.590
that way. Do you want a dog? Sure. I want a dog.

00:10:21.889 –> 00:10:24.799
But I… Don’t want one so much that I’m going

00:10:24.799 –> 00:10:28.039
to give up anything else to get it. Or I can

00:10:28.039 –> 00:10:31.000
live with a cat. I could eat. That was from a

00:10:31.000 –> 00:10:33.639
movie one time. Are you hungry? I could eat.

00:10:34.279 –> 00:10:37.960
I don’t necessarily want to, but I could. So

00:10:37.960 –> 00:10:41.600
let’s go eat. If you want to eat, I’ll be happy

00:10:41.600 –> 00:10:45.059
to. Aren’t you allergic to cats, though? I don’t

00:10:45.059 –> 00:10:47.919
think so. No? It might just be something that

00:10:47.919 –> 00:10:50.019
we’ve always talked about. I don’t know that

00:10:50.019 –> 00:10:52.090
I’m allergic to anything. I don’t know that I

00:10:52.090 –> 00:10:54.509
want to worry. Hey, I don’t want to worry about

00:10:54.509 –> 00:10:56.710
that, whether I’m allergic to something or not.

00:10:57.830 –> 00:11:00.330
Bee stings. I haven’t been stung by a bee in

00:11:00.330 –> 00:11:03.250
probably 20 years because I’ve known that it

00:11:03.250 –> 00:11:05.889
did put me in the hospital at one time. So I’m

00:11:05.889 –> 00:11:07.870
probably allergic to, so I don’t want to get

00:11:07.870 –> 00:11:11.429
stung by a bee again. Yeah. You want not to.

00:11:11.470 –> 00:11:14.529
But if I do, yeah, if I do, I doubt that it will

00:11:14.529 –> 00:11:17.330
kill me. I mean, it was really interesting. I

00:11:17.330 –> 00:11:19.490
was working out and the hornet stung me right

00:11:19.490 –> 00:11:21.159
at the back of my neck, right on my… spinal

00:11:21.159 –> 00:11:23.879
cord. And so it took whatever the poison directly

00:11:23.879 –> 00:11:26.600
into everything. So that’s what hospitalized

00:11:26.600 –> 00:11:30.360
me for a day to get that cleared up. I imagine

00:11:30.360 –> 00:11:34.899
that even if someone that’s not usually allergic

00:11:34.899 –> 00:11:37.600
to bee stings, being stung in specific spots

00:11:37.600 –> 00:11:40.799
would be worse. It would travel faster. Yeah.

00:11:40.960 –> 00:11:43.879
Yeah. For some reason, just where I was stung,

00:11:43.879 –> 00:11:45.940
traveled it faster. If I get stung on my hands,

00:11:46.019 –> 00:11:47.720
it just swells up my hand and my arm, but it

00:11:47.720 –> 00:11:50.169
doesn’t get into my lungs and my breathing. That

00:11:50.169 –> 00:11:52.289
time it affected my breathing and it was really

00:11:52.289 –> 00:11:54.750
weird. And they say it gets worse over time.

00:11:54.889 –> 00:11:57.549
And so from that point on, I haven’t been stung.

00:11:57.669 –> 00:12:01.389
I just, I watch more carefully. So I want to

00:12:01.389 –> 00:12:04.570
not be stung. And I think that has a higher priority

00:12:04.570 –> 00:12:07.769
to me than wanting an animal or a dog or wanting

00:12:07.769 –> 00:12:11.629
to. The want thing is on a value system and it

00:12:11.629 –> 00:12:13.110
helps your priorities and helps your values.

00:12:13.250 –> 00:12:15.029
You value something higher, so that helps your

00:12:15.029 –> 00:12:16.710
priorities. You can prioritize the things you

00:12:16.710 –> 00:12:20.000
value more. If someone else values eating, I’m

00:12:20.000 –> 00:12:23.360
hungry, I want to go eat, I could eat. I’ll go

00:12:23.360 –> 00:12:26.299
with you. That’s fine. Let’s do it. Or I’ll help

00:12:26.299 –> 00:12:28.320
you cook it or I’ll cook you a meal. What do

00:12:28.320 –> 00:12:30.440
you want? Do you want salmon? We’ll make salmon

00:12:30.440 –> 00:12:33.299
and vegetables. You want me to make it? Okay,

00:12:33.399 –> 00:12:36.039
I’ll make it. I’m happy with that. If you can

00:12:36.039 –> 00:12:39.000
talk about wants, that’s a valid way to discuss

00:12:39.000 –> 00:12:42.600
things. I wonder if there is conscious wants

00:12:42.600 –> 00:12:48.120
and physical wants that you… aren’t conscious

00:12:48.120 –> 00:12:53.460
about, like needing food? Assumed wants? Well,

00:12:53.559 –> 00:12:55.740
need is the other word. I want to get to that,

00:12:55.799 –> 00:12:57.559
but I don’t want to. Oh, it’s different from,

00:12:57.580 –> 00:13:00.620
okay. A need is different from a want. So you’re

00:13:00.620 –> 00:13:02.480
identifying that, you’re pulling that in, but

00:13:02.480 –> 00:13:07.100
that’s still a necessity. That’s a want. You

00:13:07.100 –> 00:13:11.659
want to breathe and eat. But you said unconscious

00:13:11.659 –> 00:13:15.139
wants. Do you have wants that you don’t really

00:13:15.139 –> 00:13:18.730
verbalize? that you’re not consciously wanting

00:13:18.730 –> 00:13:20.830
it, but do you want something? Do you have want

00:13:20.830 –> 00:13:24.230
for things that you haven’t verbalized yet? Hmm.

00:13:24.669 –> 00:13:27.149
You know, maybe not, because if there was, then

00:13:27.149 –> 00:13:29.929
they would turn into needs. And that’s maybe

00:13:29.929 –> 00:13:32.090
the difference between a want and a need. A need

00:13:32.090 –> 00:13:35.950
is something that is necessary. Whether you think

00:13:35.950 –> 00:13:39.570
about it or not, it’s necessary, yeah? Yeah,

00:13:39.590 –> 00:13:43.250
you need oxygen. You need your lungs to operate.

00:13:43.590 –> 00:13:46.440
You don’t necessarily want them to operate. But

00:13:46.440 –> 00:13:48.419
you need it because you need it. It’s going to

00:13:48.419 –> 00:13:50.559
operate anyway, whether you consciously observe

00:13:50.559 –> 00:13:53.679
it or not, whether you notice it, it’s happening.

00:13:54.000 –> 00:13:57.399
So it doesn’t become obvious. Wants become obvious.

00:13:57.460 –> 00:14:00.539
Are all wants obvious then? When you obviate

00:14:00.539 –> 00:14:03.559
something, bring it to your consciousness, to

00:14:03.559 –> 00:14:06.559
your opening, then it becomes a want. You know,

00:14:06.559 –> 00:14:09.980
I need food. I know I need food, but I’m not

00:14:09.980 –> 00:14:11.840
necessarily hungry, so I don’t want food yet.

00:14:11.960 –> 00:14:14.179
But if I get to the point that I’m hungry, then

00:14:14.179 –> 00:14:17.070
I want food also. I know I need it, but I also

00:14:17.070 –> 00:14:19.789
want it. So now let’s do it because I want it.

00:14:19.950 –> 00:14:22.250
Yeah. You probably wouldn’t have the food unless

00:14:22.250 –> 00:14:24.649
you wanted it at some point. I mean, well, and

00:14:24.649 –> 00:14:28.049
you were saying I could eat. That person could

00:14:28.049 –> 00:14:31.669
want to eat. Yeah. And you have to want to eat

00:14:31.669 –> 00:14:33.470
in order to eat. I guess there are people who

00:14:33.470 –> 00:14:35.750
have aversions. If you have an aversion to something

00:14:35.750 –> 00:14:38.929
that you don’t want, you’re not necessarily going

00:14:38.929 –> 00:14:42.950
to do it. They will have to force you. Like cleanliness,

00:14:42.990 –> 00:14:46.700
washing your hands. Some people wash their hands all the

00:14:46.700 –> 00:14:50.360
time. They want to. And some people want to not

00:14:50.360 –> 00:14:53.259
wash their hands all the time. So if you don’t

00:14:53.259 –> 00:14:55.519
want something, you have an aversion to it. Or

00:14:55.519 –> 00:14:58.379
if it’s neutral, though, like I don’t have an

00:14:58.379 –> 00:15:00.720
aversion to more dresses. I just don’t want more

00:15:00.720 –> 00:15:03.460
dresses. I don’t have an aversion to more dogs.

00:15:03.580 –> 00:15:06.539
If a dog fell in my lap and I had to take another

00:15:06.539 –> 00:15:09.480
dog in, it’s not that I didn’t. I have a good

00:15:09.480 –> 00:15:12.440
idea then. There’s a really nice… Blue Heeler

00:15:12.440 –> 00:15:18.399
that needs to be at your house. Oh, great. It

00:15:18.399 –> 00:15:22.259
needs to fall into my lap? Yeah, it’d do very

00:15:22.259 –> 00:15:24.220
well with your two dogs. What I really want to

00:15:24.220 –> 00:15:29.000
know is why does its owner not have it? Yeah,

00:15:29.100 –> 00:15:32.139
that’s what falling into people’s laps means.

00:15:33.679 –> 00:15:37.759
It’s a question. If you want something, but you

00:15:37.759 –> 00:15:40.500
can’t take care of it where you’re at. but you

00:15:40.500 –> 00:15:43.700
still want it, then you have to see if someone

00:15:43.700 –> 00:15:46.240
else wants to help you take care of it. Yeah.

00:15:46.279 –> 00:15:49.940
And you did that for me for like a year. That

00:15:49.940 –> 00:15:53.639
was really a big thing. So I suppose it’s okay

00:15:53.639 –> 00:15:56.600
that they’re also taking advantage of you in

00:15:56.600 –> 00:16:01.740
that way. Take advantage of the hospitality of

00:16:01.740 –> 00:16:03.779
someone else who doesn’t necessarily not want

00:16:03.779 –> 00:16:06.679
it. You know, I wouldn’t go out and go through

00:16:06.679 –> 00:16:10.350
any effort to gain the dog. or the responsibility.

00:16:10.669 –> 00:16:13.269
But I’m okay taking the responsibility. It’s

00:16:13.269 –> 00:16:16.690
fine. I want, and again, that’s the pleasure

00:16:16.690 –> 00:16:19.110
of someone else, the wants of someone else. You’re

00:16:19.110 –> 00:16:21.990
prioritizing their wants. They want to keep that

00:16:21.990 –> 00:16:25.889
dog. So wants and needs. You have certain needs

00:16:25.889 –> 00:16:28.570
that are, maybe those are the unconscious things.

00:16:29.330 –> 00:16:32.190
What you need may be unconscious. And maybe it

00:16:32.190 –> 00:16:35.509
is only unconscious. Can you need something consciously?

00:16:36.009 –> 00:16:38.980
Or can you only want it consciously? Well, goodness,

00:16:39.179 –> 00:16:42.039
what is strong enough? What’s a strong enough

00:16:42.039 –> 00:16:45.259
want that it turns into a need? That is a need,

00:16:45.460 –> 00:16:51.080
yeah. Like we need an income enough, but that’s

00:16:51.080 –> 00:16:54.340
because we need food. So we want income. We want

00:16:54.340 –> 00:16:56.820
more income. You can gain income from a number

00:16:56.820 –> 00:16:58.860
of different sources. There’s a number of ways

00:16:58.860 –> 00:17:01.860
to do it. So if you want more or you want…

00:17:01.860 –> 00:17:05.420
Your needs are beyond income, though. You could…

00:17:05.720 –> 00:17:07.740
You could find some other way to meet those needs.

00:17:07.880 –> 00:17:09.940
You could just live in someone’s house as a dependent.

00:17:10.220 –> 00:17:12.259
You could be a slave and have your needs met.

00:17:12.539 –> 00:17:14.680
You could be in prison, have your needs met.

00:17:15.099 –> 00:17:21.240
Right, right. Like for my budget, I have necessities

00:17:21.240 –> 00:17:24.559
on there, things that we need, which is utilities

00:17:24.559 –> 00:17:31.619
and food. And, you know, we need to pay the mortgage.

00:17:32.019 –> 00:17:37.059
But those are really just wants. Because I don’t,

00:17:37.059 –> 00:17:39.839
I mean, the city. You’re building that. The city

00:17:39.839 –> 00:17:41.740
requires. You’re building your budget. Yeah,

00:17:41.759 –> 00:17:45.539
the city requires that we live in a house. Like

00:17:45.539 –> 00:17:49.319
I can’t, isn’t it illegal to be homeless? I think

00:17:49.319 –> 00:17:51.539
you’re not allowed to sleep. To be in a tent?

00:17:51.779 –> 00:17:55.140
On the sidewalk. You can camp out in your backyard,

00:17:55.299 –> 00:17:59.079
but you can’t camp out as your house. Yeah, right.

00:17:59.259 –> 00:18:03.039
Unless you live in Spokane or Portland or, you

00:18:03.039 –> 00:18:05.380
know, those cities that are. Yeah. Well, and

00:18:05.380 –> 00:18:09.220
there’s, like, we could camp at the 14 -day dispersed

00:18:09.220 –> 00:18:13.299
camping sites in the canyon. So maybe it’s not

00:18:13.299 –> 00:18:16.680
illegal to live like the homeless. We just can’t.

00:18:16.680 –> 00:18:20.759
There’s certain places we can’t sleep. And the

00:18:20.759 –> 00:18:22.420
city would require that you build something.

00:18:22.559 –> 00:18:24.980
If you bought a building lot and just put a tent

00:18:24.980 –> 00:18:28.220
city on it, that would not meet city code, most

00:18:28.220 –> 00:18:31.519
likely. Right. But I want to live in a house,

00:18:31.579 –> 00:18:34.190
and so I need to pay the mortgage. Right. And

00:18:34.190 –> 00:18:36.630
your budget. Well, only because you want it.

00:18:36.769 –> 00:18:39.789
The need there is subservient to a want that

00:18:39.789 –> 00:18:42.670
you have. I want to be inside of a house that’s

00:18:42.670 –> 00:18:46.170
roomy enough to operate in. So I need to build

00:18:46.170 –> 00:18:48.529
this size house. We need to pay the mortgage.

00:18:48.690 –> 00:18:52.190
We need to contract a bank to help us. And we

00:18:52.190 –> 00:18:55.750
need income to pay for that. Right. And so those

00:18:55.750 –> 00:18:58.289
needs are subservient to the wants. Your whole

00:18:58.289 –> 00:19:00.089
budget, I think, is a want. Anyone’s budget.

00:19:00.269 –> 00:19:02.990
We don’t need to do a budget. There’s no need

00:19:02.990 –> 00:19:05.809
for a budget. But the budget meets our wants.

00:19:06.009 –> 00:19:09.329
And the budget requires there’s needed necessary

00:19:09.329 –> 00:19:12.349
parts of that budget if it’s going to operate.

00:19:12.690 –> 00:19:15.950
It needs income. Yeah, the budget needs income,

00:19:16.069 –> 00:19:18.730
but the budget is only there because you want

00:19:18.730 –> 00:19:21.269
it there. Yeah, so it’s because you want it.

00:19:21.549 –> 00:19:25.250
Is there any need? Well, what needs exist regardless

00:19:25.250 –> 00:19:27.910
of whether you want them or not? Are there needs?

00:19:27.970 –> 00:19:29.569
And that may be what you’re talking about, unconscious

00:19:29.569 –> 00:19:33.400
needs. Needs that… Don’t have anything to do

00:19:33.400 –> 00:19:36.960
with any underlying wants. With your want or

00:19:36.960 –> 00:19:42.500
presupposed wants. Yeah. If you want something,

00:19:42.619 –> 00:19:45.740
you want to live in a city, so therefore you

00:19:45.740 –> 00:19:48.900
need to operate based on the city’s laws. Or

00:19:48.900 –> 00:19:52.720
you want to not live under city’s laws, so you

00:19:52.720 –> 00:19:57.140
need to find a place in the county or in another

00:19:57.140 –> 00:19:59.660
country that doesn’t have these type laws to

00:19:59.660 –> 00:20:02.259
live under. but it’s only because you want to

00:20:02.259 –> 00:20:04.700
be under those laws or outside of those laws.

00:20:05.059 –> 00:20:08.680
Well, physical needs then, does that just happen?

00:20:09.059 –> 00:20:12.539
Like we have a need for nutrition in order to

00:20:12.539 –> 00:20:14.640
stay alive, but that’s really just because we

00:20:14.640 –> 00:20:17.539
want to be alive. If you decide that you don’t

00:20:17.539 –> 00:20:20.339
want to be alive anymore, then there is intervention

00:20:20.339 –> 00:20:24.839
to say, no, no, you need this. And so intravenously,

00:20:24.900 –> 00:20:27.000
we’re going to make sure that you have sufficient

00:20:27.000 –> 00:20:31.089
for the need of staying alive. So you get intravenous

00:20:31.089 –> 00:20:33.329
feeding at the hospital or at the psych ward.

00:20:33.609 –> 00:20:35.890
They say you’re not going to be allowed to go

00:20:35.890 –> 00:20:38.589
on a hunger fast to death. You can do it for

00:20:38.589 –> 00:20:41.650
30 days, Gandhi, but you can’t do it more than

00:20:41.650 –> 00:20:44.170
that. Right. Other people step in because you’re

00:20:44.170 –> 00:20:46.829
crazy if you don’t want to be alive. And that’s

00:20:46.829 –> 00:20:49.650
based on the society, right? Those are the social

00:20:49.650 –> 00:20:52.789
laws, the rules of society that you’re in, what

00:20:52.789 –> 00:20:56.970
area you’re at. I would argue then that needs

00:20:56.970 –> 00:21:00.619
are subjective. I mean, they’re just as subjective

00:21:00.619 –> 00:21:04.599
as wants. Like, it all comes down to, they’re

00:21:04.599 –> 00:21:08.059
subjective because wants are subjective. One

00:21:08.059 –> 00:21:11.160
person doesn’t need all of the same things that

00:21:11.160 –> 00:21:13.680
another person needs because their wants are

00:21:13.680 –> 00:21:17.259
different. Yeah. So if it’s all subjective, kind

00:21:17.259 –> 00:21:19.420
of like we were talking about truth. Is there

00:21:19.420 –> 00:21:21.420
any objective? Is there any objective need? We’re

00:21:21.420 –> 00:21:23.099
trying to identify if there’s an objective need.

00:21:23.400 –> 00:21:26.299
You can choose to want it or not. And that’s

00:21:26.299 –> 00:21:30.299
maybe faith. is the idea. It’s something that

00:21:30.299 –> 00:21:32.680
you don’t know. You need something. If you’re

00:21:32.680 –> 00:21:34.740
unconscious of it, it means you don’t know. You’re

00:21:34.740 –> 00:21:37.579
agnostic. Don’t have a full knowledge of it.

00:21:37.640 –> 00:21:41.259
So I believe that I need food. That’s what everyone

00:21:41.259 –> 00:21:44.180
says. We need nutrition for the body to work.

00:21:44.339 –> 00:21:47.180
I can’t prove it. And I don’t necessarily want

00:21:47.180 –> 00:21:48.819
to prove it because I always feel better when

00:21:48.819 –> 00:21:51.500
I eat. So I’m going to continue to eat, but it’s

00:21:51.500 –> 00:21:55.880
just a faith. It’s an unconscious faith that

00:21:55.880 –> 00:21:59.809
that is a fact. Yeah. You don’t think about it,

00:21:59.829 –> 00:22:03.630
so it’s unconscious. Right. And breathing is

00:22:03.630 –> 00:22:06.309
the most unconscious. Well, not breathing. Probably

00:22:06.309 –> 00:22:07.809
the most unconscious thing is the beating of

00:22:07.809 –> 00:22:10.789
our heart and moving the blood flow through your

00:22:10.789 –> 00:22:14.410
body. We can’t even consciously do that. I guess

00:22:14.410 –> 00:22:16.190
there’s some people who can consciously slow

00:22:16.190 –> 00:22:18.769
their heartbeat, but that takes a lot of work

00:22:18.769 –> 00:22:22.650
to get that done as I understand it. Right. There’s…

00:22:22.880 –> 00:22:25.279
And you’re not thinking to your heart, okay,

00:22:25.319 –> 00:22:27.440
slow down. You’re doing a lot of other things,

00:22:27.559 –> 00:22:30.940
which results in a slower heartbeat. Could be.

00:22:31.019 –> 00:22:33.539
Yeah. Most likely. That’s what I think. Because

00:22:33.539 –> 00:22:36.900
that’s an automatic muscle, automatic process

00:22:36.900 –> 00:22:40.319
that is happening that’s necessary. It’s a need

00:22:40.319 –> 00:22:43.700
that we have no control over whatsoever. Yeah.

00:22:43.740 –> 00:22:46.099
The beating of our heart. We do have full control

00:22:46.099 –> 00:22:49.980
over our wants. And if it’s subjective. So here’s

00:22:49.980 –> 00:22:53.420
the quandary in wants. If they are subjective,

00:22:53.740 –> 00:22:56.660
which we somewhat believe that everything is,

00:22:56.839 –> 00:23:01.119
how do you get along with anyone else? There’s

00:23:01.119 –> 00:23:03.579
another want there. If you want to get along

00:23:03.579 –> 00:23:08.160
with anyone else, then you subjectively and consciously

00:23:08.160 –> 00:23:13.500
adjust. Adjust your wants to something that’s

00:23:13.500 –> 00:23:16.339
more appropriate, like living in a city. There’s

00:23:16.339 –> 00:23:18.619
a number of people in this city that want these

00:23:18.619 –> 00:23:22.680
laws. If you want… Something bad enough, you’d

00:23:22.680 –> 00:23:26.420
be willing to alter whether you wanted something

00:23:26.420 –> 00:23:30.380
else anymore. And that’s the prioritization based

00:23:30.380 –> 00:23:33.720
on your values. I think values are harder to

00:23:33.720 –> 00:23:35.900
change than priorities. So you identify your

00:23:35.900 –> 00:23:38.880
priorities. Say, you know, I really want this

00:23:38.880 –> 00:23:42.500
relationship more than I want that cat. So because

00:23:42.500 –> 00:23:46.140
I want this relationship, it’s okay. I’ll lower

00:23:46.140 –> 00:23:48.839
priority the cat, higher priority the relationship.

00:23:50.620 –> 00:23:52.740
Consequently, I get three cats in the house.

00:23:53.940 –> 00:23:57.220
Something along that line. Or I have no cats

00:23:57.220 –> 00:24:00.119
because that person’s cat priority is higher

00:24:00.119 –> 00:24:02.759
than mine. So you have to really, that relationship,

00:24:03.000 –> 00:24:07.099
communication between someone else is how high

00:24:07.099 –> 00:24:09.819
do you value this thing that we want? Both of

00:24:09.819 –> 00:24:12.640
us want it to different degrees on a spectrum

00:24:12.640 –> 00:24:16.819
of wants. And whose degree is higher for a positive

00:24:16.819 –> 00:24:19.519
action to it or a negative action to it? How

00:24:19.519 –> 00:24:24.319
do you decide that? Right. And you can’t just

00:24:24.319 –> 00:24:29.000
take in a desire for whatever it is. That’s not

00:24:29.000 –> 00:24:31.460
the only metric to consider because there’s also

00:24:31.460 –> 00:24:35.259
a desire for definitely not whatever it is. If

00:24:35.259 –> 00:24:42.119
I hate cats, then that kind of is heavier than

00:24:42.119 –> 00:24:45.640
if I just don’t want cats. Yeah. Well, the heaviest

00:24:45.640 –> 00:24:47.519
would be if you’re allergic to it and it’s not.

00:24:47.880 –> 00:24:50.539
a possibility for you. Well, that’s the, yeah,

00:24:50.619 –> 00:24:52.099
that’s the heaviest. There are those things that

00:24:52.099 –> 00:24:55.960
are completely, but if you, if you hate it, like

00:24:55.960 –> 00:25:01.259
zesty foods, just hate zesty foods, can’t handle

00:25:01.259 –> 00:25:04.180
it. I might die if I had it. Maybe not literally,

00:25:04.339 –> 00:25:06.720
but actually it’s not going to be pleasurable

00:25:06.720 –> 00:25:08.980
at all. And I’m, it’s going to upset my whole

00:25:08.980 –> 00:25:13.660
day. I think people have actually gone into like

00:25:13.660 –> 00:25:17.950
cardiac arrest as a result of the spicy. Like

00:25:17.950 –> 00:25:20.930
the ghost pepper challenge and stuff like there

00:25:20.930 –> 00:25:25.289
it is. It can be. Oh, yeah, that’s right. Harmful.

00:25:25.450 –> 00:25:29.690
So but yeah, so it can it can kill you. Spicy

00:25:29.690 –> 00:25:32.410
food will kill you provided it’s spicy enough.

00:25:33.450 –> 00:25:35.589
So depending on where you are on the spectrum,

00:25:35.650 –> 00:25:38.549
if it’s a necessary never touch it, then the

00:25:38.549 –> 00:25:41.309
person who says I could have it or not automatically

00:25:41.309 –> 00:25:46.440
based on the relationship. It’s easier to make

00:25:46.440 –> 00:25:50.799
the choice to forego what you desire as a want

00:25:50.799 –> 00:25:53.859
to someone else because their value is higher.

00:25:54.240 –> 00:25:57.039
They’ve got a higher value on it. We’re kind

00:25:57.039 –> 00:26:00.819
of talking about the win -win thing from the

00:26:00.819 –> 00:26:03.980
seven habits. And you have to be on the win -win

00:26:03.980 –> 00:26:05.759
spectrum in order to even have that discussion.

00:26:06.079 –> 00:26:08.240
Yeah, rather than saying, well, I’m going to

00:26:08.240 –> 00:26:11.079
have this whether you want it or not, whether

00:26:11.079 –> 00:26:13.700
you hate it or not. Yeah. That’s a win -lose.

00:26:13.720 –> 00:26:17.019
That’s a win -lose. Or because you hate it so

00:26:17.019 –> 00:26:19.940
much, I’m going to do it. Right. I’m going to

00:26:19.940 –> 00:26:23.420
make you lose. What we learn from that, that

00:26:23.420 –> 00:26:26.460
always loses for both of you. Both of you lose

00:26:26.460 –> 00:26:29.119
if you try to make someone else lose. A lose

00:26:29.119 –> 00:26:31.519
-win or a win -lose, if you try to win and let

00:26:31.519 –> 00:26:33.640
someone else lose, you can’t let someone else

00:26:33.640 –> 00:26:36.880
lose. You have to both. And it’s not a compromise.

00:26:37.240 –> 00:26:40.240
It’s not splitting the difference. It is both

00:26:40.240 –> 00:26:43.359
of you. receive enough of a win to call it a

00:26:43.359 –> 00:26:46.579
win a full win right and that’s you both have

00:26:46.579 –> 00:26:50.599
to be in the win -win mindset because if if one

00:26:50.599 –> 00:26:54.400
person’s like well i’m i consider it a win if

00:26:54.400 –> 00:26:57.880
this option is the only option that i get like

00:26:57.880 –> 00:27:03.319
i must have what must you have i must have chocolate

00:27:03.319 –> 00:27:07.059
in my house all the time and It’s only a win

00:27:07.059 –> 00:27:09.539
for me if I have chocolate in the house, regardless

00:27:09.539 –> 00:27:13.460
of whether you think that… Chocolate in the

00:27:13.460 –> 00:27:16.519
house. Yeah, call it a candy drawer. Okay, a

00:27:16.519 –> 00:27:19.740
candy drawer. I’ve got to have candy bars of

00:27:19.740 –> 00:27:22.079
chocolate, and it’s got to be a drawer full,

00:27:22.279 –> 00:27:24.740
and I have to have a variety. It’s going to be

00:27:24.740 –> 00:27:27.319
like a store shelf in my house if I’m going to

00:27:27.319 –> 00:27:31.680
be happy. And it doesn’t matter if you like it

00:27:31.680 –> 00:27:35.289
or not. Any solution, any resolution that we

00:27:35.289 –> 00:27:38.349
come as to this issue of the candy drawer is

00:27:38.349 –> 00:27:40.869
going to have to result in me having a candy

00:27:40.869 –> 00:27:44.609
drawer. That’s a lose. What is that, a win -lose?

00:27:45.170 –> 00:27:48.609
A win -lose? Yeah. But is that a need? Okay,

00:27:48.750 –> 00:27:51.809
and that does go to this, what I wanted to talk

00:27:51.809 –> 00:27:54.549
about, needs. Needs have to be justified. So

00:27:54.549 –> 00:27:58.029
the win -lose, if you can call it a need, or

00:27:58.029 –> 00:28:00.910
if you do call it a need, there’s a justification

00:28:00.910 –> 00:28:03.740
for it. In order to live, your heart needs to

00:28:03.740 –> 00:28:07.460
beat. So the blood flow of your body is necessary.

00:28:07.700 –> 00:28:10.220
It’s a need. So justification of that is, do

00:28:10.220 –> 00:28:12.799
you want to live? To live, you need your heart

00:28:12.799 –> 00:28:15.740
to beat. To live, you need oxygen to flow into

00:28:15.740 –> 00:28:18.420
your blood so that it can do that. So you need

00:28:18.420 –> 00:28:20.819
to breathe. That’s a necessity. In order for

00:28:20.819 –> 00:28:24.000
me to be happy breathing and living, I need to

00:28:24.000 –> 00:28:27.720
have candy. I need to have a candy drawer. I

00:28:27.720 –> 00:28:29.980
need to have chocolate. And it needs to be a

00:28:29.980 –> 00:28:35.140
variety. I need a variety. If you say need, then

00:28:35.140 –> 00:28:37.779
it requires a justification. And that’s where

00:28:37.779 –> 00:28:40.000
the wants come in. Is it a need or a want? What

00:28:40.000 –> 00:28:43.200
is the want behind this need? Yeah. Well, and

00:28:43.200 –> 00:28:45.220
maybe some psychologists would say, what is the

00:28:45.220 –> 00:28:48.440
need behind this want? You want a candy drawer

00:28:48.440 –> 00:28:50.960
so badly. What is the need that you’re exhibiting?

00:28:51.359 –> 00:28:54.180
What happened in your childhood to where you

00:28:54.180 –> 00:28:58.960
need something and the candy drawer is the cure?

00:28:59.140 –> 00:29:02.349
Represents that. Maybe we have it backwards.

00:29:02.450 –> 00:29:05.809
Maybe wants are needs and needs are wants. No,

00:29:05.950 –> 00:29:08.509
what does that mean? What does that mean? Well,

00:29:08.529 –> 00:29:11.789
I’m just saying, like, I’m imagining a psychologist

00:29:11.789 –> 00:29:15.390
saying, what does this want of a candy drawer

00:29:15.390 –> 00:29:18.529
represent? What need does it represent? You need

00:29:18.529 –> 00:29:24.470
a constant supply of… Chocolate. Yeah, of comfort

00:29:24.470 –> 00:29:27.410
foods, maybe. Maybe the chocolate is your comfort

00:29:27.410 –> 00:29:30.380
food. So you need that. That’s the need behind

00:29:30.380 –> 00:29:33.240
the candy drawer. And where did that come from?

00:29:33.519 –> 00:29:37.599
Why is that a need of yours? I don’t know. I’m

00:29:37.599 –> 00:29:39.079
not a psychologist. Is there anything that we

00:29:39.079 –> 00:29:42.319
need? It’s interesting to talk about that, the

00:29:42.319 –> 00:29:44.539
candy drawer, but I don’t know that either of

00:29:44.539 –> 00:29:46.299
us necessarily need a candy drawer. Is there

00:29:46.299 –> 00:29:49.460
something that you or I need that we can put

00:29:49.460 –> 00:29:51.400
in that same discussion? Because it’d be easier

00:29:51.400 –> 00:29:55.980
if we actually had that idea. Right. Okay. So

00:29:55.980 –> 00:30:00.380
how about I need… To drink eight glasses of

00:30:00.380 –> 00:30:03.539
water every day. Eight glasses of water. Yeah,

00:30:03.579 –> 00:30:06.920
but really that’s a want because the underlying

00:30:06.920 –> 00:30:12.700
need is hydration, is my body’s, the underlying

00:30:12.700 –> 00:30:17.519
need is my body’s need for hydration. And I can

00:30:17.519 –> 00:30:21.759
get that by eating just a whole bunch of watermelon.

00:30:21.900 –> 00:30:24.920
I don’t need to be drinking the water. I could

00:30:24.920 –> 00:30:27.839
have watermelon instead. Could have watermelon.

00:30:28.319 –> 00:30:33.720
Oranges. Yeah. So the want is water, but the

00:30:33.720 –> 00:30:37.579
need is hydration, right? You want water or you

00:30:37.579 –> 00:30:40.400
want cranberry juice or you want orange juice

00:30:40.400 –> 00:30:42.740
or you want milk. Yeah. And maybe this is just

00:30:42.740 –> 00:30:46.539
something being too specific about what I think

00:30:46.539 –> 00:30:49.599
that I need. And there’s a different way, different

00:30:49.599 –> 00:30:51.140
ways to figure out the water. I mean, you’re

00:30:51.140 –> 00:30:53.500
supposed to drink the ounces of water that you

00:30:53.500 –> 00:30:57.039
weigh in pounds every day. Yeah, I think it’s.

00:30:57.279 –> 00:31:01.160
One ounce per two pounds or one ounce per kilogram.

00:31:01.759 –> 00:31:05.640
Half of the ounces of water that you weigh. Yeah.

00:31:06.039 –> 00:31:09.160
From 190, it’d be 80 ounces of water a day. So

00:31:09.160 –> 00:31:12.539
that’d be four 20 -ounce glasses every day. You

00:31:12.539 –> 00:31:15.140
could do that. And if you’re eating eight 20

00:31:15.140 –> 00:31:18.380
-ounce glasses, that means you’re 260 pounds.

00:31:19.940 –> 00:31:22.420
So it depends on the size of the glass, too.

00:31:22.519 –> 00:31:26.500
I think eight glasses of water, they’re generally…

00:31:27.240 –> 00:31:29.539
They might not be 20 ounces. These are eight

00:31:29.539 –> 00:31:34.960
ounce cups. Okay. All right. So 80 is appropriate

00:31:34.960 –> 00:31:38.140
for a 200 pound person or 160. So there’s an

00:31:38.140 –> 00:31:40.240
appropriate amount of water. So you need, and

00:31:40.240 –> 00:31:42.759
that’s the justification. So that is probably

00:31:42.759 –> 00:31:45.460
a good example. The justification is we know

00:31:45.460 –> 00:31:48.839
scientifically or we subjectively know scientifically

00:31:48.839 –> 00:31:52.539
that you need that much water in a day. You can

00:31:52.539 –> 00:31:55.160
objectively feel better. Because you drink more

00:31:55.160 –> 00:31:56.839
water. You can feel better when you drink more

00:31:56.839 –> 00:31:59.200
water. So you can test that out and say, maybe

00:31:59.200 –> 00:32:01.420
I’ll drink less. See if I feel better if I drink

00:32:01.420 –> 00:32:03.859
less or feel better if you drink more. And obviously,

00:32:04.079 –> 00:32:06.680
you can obviously identify that in your own life

00:32:06.680 –> 00:32:09.599
that if you drink more water or get more fluids,

00:32:09.839 –> 00:32:13.119
you’re going to be better off in life. Healthier.

00:32:13.480 –> 00:32:18.519
Yes. But lots of people don’t drink what they

00:32:18.519 –> 00:32:22.980
need. Need in quotes. And so really, that need

00:32:22.980 –> 00:32:26.250
is a want. And what they really need is one cup

00:32:26.250 –> 00:32:30.230
of water a day to stay alive. Like the need is

00:32:30.230 –> 00:32:32.970
to be hydrated so you stay alive. And our bodies

00:32:32.970 –> 00:32:36.950
can actually survive on much less than what the

00:32:36.950 –> 00:32:39.250
recommended amount is. You’re just going to be

00:32:39.250 –> 00:32:42.390
kind of feeling crummy because of it. But the

00:32:42.390 –> 00:32:47.470
actual need is more like a cup, maybe. I don’t

00:32:47.470 –> 00:32:51.740
know. I’m not a doctor. But even the doctors

00:32:51.740 –> 00:32:55.160
don’t know. I’m not God, so I can’t say exactly

00:32:55.160 –> 00:32:58.700
how much my body really, really needs in order

00:32:58.700 –> 00:33:01.420
to stay alive. But I know that it’s much less

00:33:01.420 –> 00:33:04.700
than eight cups a day because I frequently go

00:33:04.700 –> 00:33:09.240
for long periods of time without eight cups a

00:33:09.240 –> 00:33:13.039
day. I have maybe one intentional cup of water

00:33:13.039 –> 00:33:16.000
a day, and then everything else comes from whatever

00:33:16.000 –> 00:33:19.279
food I eat. Yeah, there’s a justification for

00:33:19.279 –> 00:33:22.599
it. Still, you’re justifying that maybe you only

00:33:22.599 –> 00:33:25.559
need one. Yeah, and maybe everything adds up

00:33:25.559 –> 00:33:29.400
to eight, which would be surprising because my

00:33:29.400 –> 00:33:33.299
nutrition is just really bad anyway. The psychologist

00:33:33.299 –> 00:33:36.500
that’s talking about this is what need is that

00:33:36.500 –> 00:33:39.980
representing? Does that want represent? So would

00:33:39.980 –> 00:33:41.859
there always be an underlying need to whatever

00:33:41.859 –> 00:33:44.490
we want? That’s, I think, what you pointed to

00:33:44.490 –> 00:33:47.609
are your wants needs. Your want actually identifies

00:33:47.609 –> 00:33:50.910
a need that you subconsciously are holding. And

00:33:50.910 –> 00:33:54.230
it’s a need. And that subconscious holding of

00:33:54.230 –> 00:33:58.630
whatever it is creates your wants. Yeah. So I

00:33:58.630 –> 00:34:01.990
want my husband to speak to me in my love language

00:34:01.990 –> 00:34:07.720
because I need love. Maybe? No? Do we need love?

00:34:07.839 –> 00:34:10.039
Love. Like that’s an underlying need. Everybody

00:34:10.039 –> 00:34:13.519
needs to be loved. They need that feeling of

00:34:13.519 –> 00:34:17.599
being loved. Okay. And we’ve got a reference

00:34:17.599 –> 00:34:21.920
back to what love is. When we started this a

00:34:21.920 –> 00:34:24.820
year ago almost, we discussed unconditional love

00:34:24.820 –> 00:34:28.800
and identified what that is. What you want is

00:34:28.800 –> 00:34:31.719
based on what you actually need. And you say

00:34:31.719 –> 00:34:34.860
you need it. And love, you can’t give love to

00:34:34.860 –> 00:34:36.820
someone else. You have to only receive it. So

00:34:36.820 –> 00:34:39.079
it’s what you want to receive. You need someone

00:34:39.079 –> 00:34:42.380
to speak so that you feel loved in a certain

00:34:42.380 –> 00:34:45.440
direction, order. That that love is subjective.

00:34:45.539 –> 00:34:48.179
It’s your choice as to whether you feel love

00:34:48.179 –> 00:34:53.780
or not. Yeah. Well, that maybe isn’t what we’re

00:34:53.780 –> 00:34:56.239
talking about, though. And that’s also the win

00:34:56.239 –> 00:34:59.480
-win idea. I mean, the person, your relationship

00:34:59.480 –> 00:35:03.500
partner has to also want you to feel loved. And

00:35:03.500 –> 00:35:05.780
so you feel love, so you’ve got to receive it.

00:35:06.090 –> 00:35:09.070
Yeah, but does that change whether you need to

00:35:09.070 –> 00:35:11.809
feel loved or not? Whether you want it or not,

00:35:11.869 –> 00:35:13.449
does that change whether you need it or not?

00:35:13.849 –> 00:35:17.510
Like plants. Plants need to be talked to in order

00:35:17.510 –> 00:35:20.630
to be healthy. No, they don’t. They need it.

00:35:20.929 –> 00:35:24.670
Plants in the forest grow without being talked

00:35:24.670 –> 00:35:29.530
to. They do need sunlight in order to grow. Well,

00:35:29.610 –> 00:35:31.570
some of them do. Some of them, I suppose, get

00:35:31.570 –> 00:35:34.949
by without it. And I think that is better. If

00:35:34.949 –> 00:35:36.769
you talk to your plants, they grow better. But

00:35:36.769 –> 00:35:38.989
the plants you don’t talk to grow. They grow

00:35:38.989 –> 00:35:42.030
anyway. They grow with their one ounce, one glass

00:35:42.030 –> 00:35:44.170
of water a day. But if you’ve talked to them,

00:35:44.230 –> 00:35:46.030
they’ll get eight glasses of water a day and

00:35:46.030 –> 00:35:48.750
they grow bigger and happier. Perhaps that’s

00:35:48.750 –> 00:35:53.329
the same continuum, same difference. A forest

00:35:53.329 –> 00:35:58.050
that is managed and talked to grows better than

00:35:58.050 –> 00:36:01.170
a forest that is left fallow and just do what

00:36:01.170 –> 00:36:04.289
it does. You can manage a forest and it’s a beautiful

00:36:04.289 –> 00:36:07.670
place and the trees all thrive. And the ones

00:36:07.670 –> 00:36:10.030
that you choose to live, you know, you pare back

00:36:10.030 –> 00:36:13.150
the things that aren’t right. And it allows the

00:36:13.150 –> 00:36:16.849
things that should be there to grow better. If

00:36:16.849 –> 00:36:19.210
you don’t manage the forest at all, it just becomes

00:36:19.210 –> 00:36:22.590
a tangled mess. And then the wildfires come and

00:36:22.590 –> 00:36:24.610
burn it all down and they manage themselves.

00:36:25.809 –> 00:36:31.150
So what question could be solved by… knowing

00:36:31.150 –> 00:36:34.469
the difference between needs and wants. Here’s

00:36:34.469 –> 00:36:39.050
one, maybe, if you can’t come up with one. What

00:36:39.050 –> 00:36:42.630
if somebody says that you should need something

00:36:42.630 –> 00:36:45.630
and you’re just not needing it, or you should

00:36:45.630 –> 00:36:47.389
want something and you’re just not wanting it?

00:36:47.650 –> 00:36:52.090
Is this a should versus ought problem? The is

00:36:52.090 –> 00:36:56.289
ought problem? What is? Loving what is? Not is

00:36:56.289 –> 00:36:59.289
ought, really. Well, is ought is the problem.

00:36:59.389 –> 00:37:01.570
Should ought. You ought to do it. You should

00:37:01.570 –> 00:37:05.530
do it. And is, what are you doing? What is? So

00:37:05.530 –> 00:37:08.630
that’s the is -ought problem. Is it? Okay. Yeah.

00:37:08.769 –> 00:37:11.829
And that is loving what is. Loving everything.

00:37:12.389 –> 00:37:15.750
But really, really, like, what if one person

00:37:15.750 –> 00:37:22.389
is like, you all need to want, you all need to

00:37:22.389 –> 00:37:27.250
accept that fetuses are alive and you may not

00:37:27.250 –> 00:37:30.400
ever abort them. They are. They are alive and

00:37:30.400 –> 00:37:34.840
they need to come be born. Whether they die right

00:37:34.840 –> 00:37:37.519
after they’re born or not, that you need to give

00:37:37.519 –> 00:37:41.300
them that chance. It needs to be not you that

00:37:41.300 –> 00:37:44.159
kills them. And we believe that enough that we

00:37:44.159 –> 00:37:46.639
need to make a law. There needs to be a law.

00:37:46.980 –> 00:37:49.699
And everybody needs to agree with that. Everyone

00:37:49.699 –> 00:37:52.340
needs to agree with that. Everyone needs to comply.

00:37:52.519 –> 00:37:54.320
Whether they agree or not, whether they have

00:37:54.320 –> 00:37:57.019
faith or confidence in it, they still need to

00:37:57.019 –> 00:38:01.360
comply to it. So agreement and compliance are

00:38:01.360 –> 00:38:04.639
different. The protesters outside of the Planned

00:38:04.639 –> 00:38:07.820
Parenthood and all of that, aren’t they out there

00:38:07.820 –> 00:38:10.539
trying to convince the other people that they’re

00:38:10.539 –> 00:38:14.059
wrong and they actually need to want to save

00:38:14.059 –> 00:38:16.659
the babies rather than kill the babies? I mean,

00:38:16.719 –> 00:38:21.300
we had recently talked about protests, but ideally

00:38:21.300 –> 00:38:26.039
what a protest would do would change minds. Yeah?

00:38:26.739 –> 00:38:29.920
Persuasion? They’re using protest as a mode of

00:38:29.920 –> 00:38:33.340
persuasion and motivation to change someone’s

00:38:33.340 –> 00:38:36.719
direction. Yeah. I mean, if you see a sign. And

00:38:36.719 –> 00:38:41.820
who wants something in that case? Try to identify

00:38:41.820 –> 00:38:44.840
the need or the want. The need is that the baby

00:38:44.840 –> 00:38:50.119
needs to live or the baby needs to, the fetus.

00:38:50.219 –> 00:38:52.960
Yeah, the one side says that that fetus has needs.

00:38:53.639 –> 00:38:57.699
And we need to, we’re required to allow that

00:38:57.699 –> 00:39:02.219
fetus to be born. Barring, you know, crazy circumstances

00:39:02.219 –> 00:39:05.420
that it can’t be born or there’s other complications.

00:39:05.599 –> 00:39:08.579
There are always complications that allow something

00:39:08.579 –> 00:39:11.420
to not be, require something to not be done.

00:39:11.559 –> 00:39:14.460
A higher value, a higher priority, or a more

00:39:14.460 –> 00:39:18.239
obvious priority. Yeah. The question that I’m

00:39:18.239 –> 00:39:21.179
trying to ask, though, is what if someone else

00:39:21.179 –> 00:39:24.010
thinks that Your wants and your needs aren’t

00:39:24.010 –> 00:39:26.489
in the right place. They’re wrong. You have the

00:39:26.489 –> 00:39:28.789
wrong wants and needs. Which means you have the

00:39:28.789 –> 00:39:33.510
wrong value system. That’s where that’s the only

00:39:33.510 –> 00:39:36.210
place it can go. If you have the wrong wants

00:39:36.210 –> 00:39:38.869
and needs, it’s because you’re valuing something

00:39:38.869 –> 00:39:42.369
incorrectly. And now my persuasion is to help

00:39:42.369 –> 00:39:44.889
you see the value from this different perspective.

00:39:45.309 –> 00:39:47.449
So you’ve got to step away from what you’re thinking

00:39:47.449 –> 00:39:50.329
because what you’re thinking is wrong. That value

00:39:50.329 –> 00:39:53.429
is incorrect. This value is more valid. And so

00:39:53.429 –> 00:39:57.190
let me help persuade you by protesting, by writing

00:39:57.190 –> 00:40:00.389
this sign that says whatever it says to help

00:40:00.389 –> 00:40:02.869
convince someone on the street that sees it,

00:40:02.889 –> 00:40:06.409
that there’s a higher value here. Motivation.

00:40:06.590 –> 00:40:08.250
Let’s talk about that because you’re trying to

00:40:08.250 –> 00:40:10.409
motivate someone to do something. I think it

00:40:10.409 –> 00:40:12.789
was in the Seven Habits book about motivation.

00:40:13.289 –> 00:40:16.650
I just looked at that the other day. I just have

00:40:16.650 –> 00:40:19.869
to say it. I can’t, I can’t find it. Well, it

00:40:19.869 –> 00:40:22.789
does have an index in the back, doesn’t it? It

00:40:22.789 –> 00:40:26.610
does. And it has what I wrote in the front, even.

00:40:26.889 –> 00:40:30.110
I can’t remember exactly. The paraphrase of it

00:40:30.110 –> 00:40:35.150
is, satisfied needs do not motivate. Okay. Yes.

00:40:35.369 –> 00:40:38.730
That’s like somebody needs to want something

00:40:38.730 –> 00:40:42.909
badly enough to work to get it. To work, to be

00:40:42.909 –> 00:40:45.309
motivated, do something to gain it. It needs

00:40:45.309 –> 00:40:47.550
to hurt. Once you have it, then you’re no longer

00:40:47.550 –> 00:40:50.949
motivated. And how did that come out? It’s got

00:40:50.949 –> 00:40:53.309
to be in the win -win chapter here. It has to

00:40:53.309 –> 00:40:56.389
just be motivation. Yeah, there it is. It’s satisfied

00:40:56.389 –> 00:41:00.110
needs to not motivate. He said next to physical

00:41:00.110 –> 00:41:03.269
survival. So physical survival is a need, he’s

00:41:03.269 –> 00:41:06.110
pointing out. Next to physical survival, the

00:41:06.110 –> 00:41:09.110
greatest need of a human being is psychological

00:41:09.110 –> 00:41:13.829
survival. He talks about giving them psychological

00:41:13.829 –> 00:41:17.550
air. They need to be understood. to be affirmed,

00:41:17.550 –> 00:41:20.869
to be validated, to be appreciated. Those are

00:41:20.869 –> 00:41:22.909
needs. And that gives you that psychological

00:41:22.909 –> 00:41:25.449
air are those things. Needs are to be understood,

00:41:25.570 –> 00:41:28.250
affirmed, validated, and appreciated. That gives

00:41:28.250 –> 00:41:30.829
a person a psychological air. And then when

00:41:30.829 –> 00:41:33.949
that vital need is met, both the survival and

00:41:33.949 –> 00:41:37.570
the psychological, then you can focus on influencing

00:41:37.570 –> 00:41:40.650
or problem solving. So that’s how he was describing

00:41:40.650 –> 00:41:46.610
that. That’s how you get to the win -win. Those are the needs behind the wants to be

00:41:46.610 –> 00:41:49.090
able to influence them. If you want to influence

00:41:49.090 –> 00:41:51.869
them, they need those things. They don’t necessarily

00:41:51.869 –> 00:41:54.170
need those things if you don’t want to influence

00:41:54.170 –> 00:41:57.610
them, right? In order to be motivated, well,

00:41:58.289 –> 00:41:59.750
if you’re talking about influence as motivation,

00:42:00.130 –> 00:42:03.610
you want to motivate something, you’re to influence

00:42:03.610 –> 00:42:06.650
or persuade. You’re trying to motivate, trying

00:42:06.650 –> 00:42:08.929
to get someone on your side or get a win -win

00:42:08.929 –> 00:42:10.849
out of it. You want them to win, you want to

00:42:10.849 –> 00:42:14.230
win, and it requires that other person. So in

00:42:14.230 –> 00:42:16.869
order to do that, you do have to give that psychological

00:42:16.869 –> 00:42:20.449
air. You have to understand, affirm, validate,

00:42:20.630 –> 00:42:26.170
and what were they? Understand, affirm, validate,

00:42:26.489 –> 00:42:29.030
and appreciate. You have to actually appreciate.

00:42:29.690 –> 00:42:32.789
Align yourself with what they’re doing. So to

00:42:32.789 –> 00:42:36.769
understand something. Yeah, those are situation

00:42:36.769 –> 00:42:41.170
-specific needs. They’re not like all -the -time

00:42:41.170 –> 00:42:44.099
needs. Subjective? You’re saying situation specific?

00:42:44.780 –> 00:42:49.260
Yeah. If I didn’t want to motivate or influence

00:42:49.260 –> 00:42:52.820
somebody, then they don’t need those things from

00:42:52.820 –> 00:42:55.219
me. I don’t need to give them psychological air.

00:42:55.219 –> 00:42:56.719
They don’t need it from you, but they do need

00:42:56.719 –> 00:42:59.599
it from someone. Everyone needs it from someone.

00:42:59.599 –> 00:43:02.639
We can’t do anything without being motivated

00:43:02.639 –> 00:43:05.519
to do it. That’s what a want is. Isn’t a want

00:43:05.519 –> 00:43:09.519
a motivation? Yeah. If you’re not motivated to

00:43:09.519 –> 00:43:12.079
do something, you don’t want anything. I’m just

00:43:12.079 –> 00:43:15.199
going to sit here on this chair. I have no motivation.

00:43:15.219 –> 00:43:18.780
I have no wants. I want for nothing. I’m completely

00:43:18.780 –> 00:43:23.340
content where I am. I said earlier that needs

00:43:23.340 –> 00:43:26.760
are completely subjective, but this is an example

00:43:26.760 –> 00:43:30.039
of a need that is not subjective. It’s an objective

00:43:30.039 –> 00:43:33.699
need. No, you said wants are subjective. I said

00:43:33.699 –> 00:43:36.940
needs and wants. Okay, and I believe that…

00:43:37.210 –> 00:43:39.909
Because needs come from wants that if I want

00:43:39.909 –> 00:43:43.170
to stay alive, then I need to eat food. Then

00:43:43.170 –> 00:43:45.489
the needs are there. So you want to stay alive.

00:43:45.590 –> 00:43:48.670
If you want to pass away, then you need to get

00:43:48.670 –> 00:43:50.989
away from people because they won’t let you pass

00:43:50.989 –> 00:43:54.789
away. Right. Yeah. Your needs come from what

00:43:54.789 –> 00:43:58.809
your wants are. If you want to pass on, you can

00:43:58.809 –> 00:44:02.409
only do that if you’re alone, because to get

00:44:02.409 –> 00:44:04.829
to receive help would be illegal. That would

00:44:04.829 –> 00:44:07.269
be something that. The general society says,

00:44:07.389 –> 00:44:11.090
no, you can’t help someone in that venture to

00:44:11.090 –> 00:44:13.889
pass on. If you help them, then you’re at fault.

00:44:14.010 –> 00:44:19.510
And your needs are subjective too then. I think

00:44:19.510 –> 00:44:22.309
survival, yeah, you’re saying even survival is

00:44:22.309 –> 00:44:25.329
a subjective need. You don’t have to want to

00:44:25.329 –> 00:44:28.150
survive. Because we want to survive, there’s

00:44:28.150 –> 00:44:30.829
these needs, there’s these necessities. So all

00:44:30.829 –> 00:44:33.250
of this is subjective. There is no objective.

00:44:33.750 –> 00:44:39.090
Is there an is then? Love what is. What is it

00:44:39.090 –> 00:44:42.789
that Byron Katie said? What’s her book? The is.

00:44:42.849 –> 00:44:46.809
The is is just how it is. It’s not how you want.

00:44:47.190 –> 00:44:49.610
It’s the objective. I haven’t read the book.

00:44:49.889 –> 00:44:53.650
The circumstance. But it’s the objective, observable,

00:44:53.730 –> 00:44:57.449
testable. Yeah, the circumstance. The circumstance

00:44:57.449 –> 00:45:00.929
exists. And you have to appreciate that it’s

00:45:00.929 –> 00:45:03.559
there. But you don’t have to be motivated by

00:45:03.559 –> 00:45:05.480
it. It’s not a need, the fact, the circumstance

00:45:05.480 –> 00:45:08.059
here. It’s not a need that you have that. You

00:45:08.059 –> 00:45:10.539
want it. You have a thought about the circumstance.

00:45:10.840 –> 00:45:13.539
So your thought is either I want it or I don’t

00:45:13.539 –> 00:45:16.900
want it. You go one way or the other with it.

00:45:17.280 –> 00:45:21.260
Right. Then are we agreeing that it’s all subjective

00:45:21.260 –> 00:45:25.539
then? Yes, I think we are. You don’t have, because

00:45:25.539 –> 00:45:28.760
the circumstance is inanimate. It’s just there,

00:45:28.900 –> 00:45:31.960
the relationship. is a circumstance, your relationship

00:45:31.960 –> 00:45:34.619
with someone else. Our conversation here is just

00:45:34.619 –> 00:45:37.139
a circumstance. You have wants and I have wants.

00:45:37.219 –> 00:45:40.820
And sometimes, yeah, we have to pay attention

00:45:40.820 –> 00:45:44.199
to what the other one’s saying in order to be

00:45:44.199 –> 00:45:47.559
effective. If that’s what we want, if being effective

00:45:47.559 –> 00:45:50.280
is what we want. And if we don’t want to be effective,

00:45:50.400 –> 00:45:53.320
let’s say one of us comes with a, well, we’re

00:45:53.320 –> 00:45:56.059
in this for a win -win. There’s not a win -lose

00:45:56.059 –> 00:45:58.420
mentality. I’m not trying to make sure that my

00:45:58.420 –> 00:46:02.300
things… Come out on top that I have the best.

00:46:03.159 –> 00:46:05.679
That’s what I’ve been accused of at times. That

00:46:05.679 –> 00:46:10.179
you just want to spout your crazy ideas. And,

00:46:10.219 –> 00:46:12.579
you know, we are talking about ideas, but your

00:46:12.579 –> 00:46:16.059
ideas are just as crazy as mine. Trying to identify

00:46:16.059 –> 00:46:18.699
that needs are subjective. That’s something neither

00:46:18.699 –> 00:46:21.280
of us came to this conversation thinking. Would

00:46:21.280 –> 00:46:25.059
you agree? Yeah. Because need, like the very

00:46:25.059 –> 00:46:30.760
word implies objective. You need food. Right.

00:46:30.980 –> 00:46:34.699
But only if you want to stay alive. And only

00:46:34.699 –> 00:46:36.780
if you want food at that time. You need food,

00:46:36.820 –> 00:46:40.699
but maybe only every once a day, perhaps, you

00:46:40.699 –> 00:46:43.099
know, in a normal sense. Yeah, there are certainly

00:46:43.099 –> 00:46:46.500
people living just fine on once a day meals.

00:46:46.599 –> 00:46:49.900
Yeah. And maybe it’s every third day that you

00:46:49.900 –> 00:46:52.360
could get by for a month. You know, if you go

00:46:52.360 –> 00:46:54.940
on an extended fast, you can do an extended fast,

00:46:55.099 –> 00:46:58.639
go seven or 14 days without food at all. just liquids.

00:46:59.420 –> 00:47:03.599
So those longer time things occur and people

00:47:03.599 –> 00:47:06.760
do them regularly. And so it’s not objective

00:47:06.760 –> 00:47:09.000
that everybody needs three square meals a day.

00:47:09.340 –> 00:47:12.340
Right. And it’s subjective as to what your goal

00:47:12.340 –> 00:47:14.780
is, what you want to accomplish, what you’re

00:47:14.780 –> 00:47:18.400
trying to reach maybe in another avenue. So the

00:47:18.400 –> 00:47:21.820
win -win idea, though, you have to be able to

00:47:21.820 –> 00:47:24.099
serve someone’s psychological error. That’s where

00:47:24.099 –> 00:47:27.059
his description, Covey’s description was. in

00:47:27.059 –> 00:47:29.159
relation to that is how you get to that win -win

00:47:29.159 –> 00:47:33.699
idea or concept. You have to allow people, you

00:47:33.699 –> 00:47:36.219
have to feed them enough, understand them well

00:47:36.219 –> 00:47:38.659
enough before you try to be understood on your

00:47:38.659 –> 00:47:40.920
side. It’s still your need to be understood,

00:47:41.039 –> 00:47:44.119
that psychological need. And one of you have

00:47:44.119 –> 00:47:47.539
to step out first and try to understand and then

00:47:47.539 –> 00:47:51.300
affirm, validate it and appreciate it. To influence

00:47:51.300 –> 00:47:53.280
and persuade, you have to be able to do that

00:47:53.280 –> 00:47:56.829
first. This has to do with being meek. As well,

00:47:56.949 –> 00:47:59.110
meekness. And I’m going to talk about this again.

00:47:59.150 –> 00:48:00.469
I’ve been thinking about that. That word comes

00:48:00.469 –> 00:48:05.409
up. Neat? Meek. M -E -A -T? No, M. Oh, meek.

00:48:05.429 –> 00:48:09.789
M -E -E -K? M -E -E -K. Okay. Meekness, as opposed

00:48:09.789 –> 00:48:11.929
to what’s the opposite of meekness? Grandiosity.

00:48:12.449 –> 00:48:14.909
Being the center of attention. Being meek and

00:48:14.909 –> 00:48:20.880
lowly. Or being grandiose and centered. So meekness,

00:48:20.980 –> 00:48:23.320
you’re going to pay attention to what other people

00:48:23.320 –> 00:48:26.099
need or understand. You’re going to pay attention

00:48:26.099 –> 00:48:28.500
to understanding them, pay attention to affirming

00:48:28.500 –> 00:48:31.800
them, to validate them, to appreciate them. Thank

00:48:31.800 –> 00:48:36.960
you kindly. That’s a word that my stepfather

00:48:36.960 –> 00:48:40.139
says. I happen to be visiting with my mother

00:48:40.139 –> 00:48:43.719
and her husband, which is not my father, but

00:48:43.719 –> 00:48:46.900
he says, thank you kindly. That’s an appreciative

00:48:46.900 –> 00:48:50.829
statement. It is. He says that quite often. He’s

00:48:50.829 –> 00:48:53.429
always said that, though. It sounds, yeah, it

00:48:53.429 –> 00:48:56.750
sounds like it’s his phrase. Yeah, it’s his phrase.

00:48:56.949 –> 00:49:00.150
He maybe meant it much more the first couple

00:49:00.150 –> 00:49:02.469
of times he said it, but now it’s just something

00:49:02.469 –> 00:49:05.190
he always says. It’s normal. I’m finding myself

00:49:05.190 –> 00:49:08.809
saying, thank you, sir, a lot when people give

00:49:08.809 –> 00:49:11.769
me stuff, or thank you, ma ‘am, you know? Okay,

00:49:11.829 –> 00:49:13.190
you’re using a formal. It doesn’t mean anything

00:49:13.190 –> 00:49:17.460
now, but I, yeah. Maybe the first couple of times

00:49:17.460 –> 00:49:19.440
I used it, it really meant something. Like I

00:49:19.440 –> 00:49:23.619
was actually trying to be respectful, but now

00:49:23.619 –> 00:49:26.679
it just comes out. Yeah, it’s a formal addition

00:49:26.679 –> 00:49:31.519
to it. And it becomes you. So it becomes a characteristic.

00:49:32.280 –> 00:49:34.380
You’re developing into that person. You become

00:49:34.380 –> 00:49:37.219
that. And that’s what we’re trying to accomplish

00:49:37.219 –> 00:49:40.239
here. We’re trying to see this, it’s not necessarily

00:49:40.239 –> 00:49:42.840
meekness, but it is. Meekness means that you’re

00:49:42.840 –> 00:49:44.420
paying more attention to someone else than you

00:49:44.420 –> 00:49:48.920
are to you. happy to kindly thank them or to

00:49:48.920 –> 00:49:53.639
thank you, sir, for something. Acknowledge them.

00:49:53.880 –> 00:49:58.800
That’s an affirmation. That’s a validation. I

00:49:58.800 –> 00:50:01.659
believe you’re a gentleman. And I believe you’re

00:50:01.659 –> 00:50:06.760
a lady rather than just a girl. Yeah. I mean,

00:50:06.780 –> 00:50:08.820
the language that you use does matter. And I

00:50:08.820 –> 00:50:11.099
think we’ll talk about that. Hopefully we’ll

00:50:11.099 –> 00:50:12.860
talk about that when we get around to talking

00:50:12.860 –> 00:50:16.920
more about idioms. phrases that people just say,

00:50:17.059 –> 00:50:19.460
you know? What I was thinking, the psychological

00:50:19.460 –> 00:50:21.820
air. We’ve used the term before, and I put

00:50:21.820 –> 00:50:25.639
it in my notes here, the manager -manager. How

00:50:25.639 –> 00:50:27.619
do you manage your manager, the person who’s

00:50:27.619 –> 00:50:32.940
got responsibility to supervise you? You supervise

00:50:32.940 –> 00:50:35.500
them with the psychological error. Too much work.

00:50:35.739 –> 00:50:38.320
It’s not my job to manage my manager. It’s their

00:50:38.320 –> 00:50:42.039
job to manage themselves and me. Right. And most

00:50:42.039 –> 00:50:44.119
people would think that if you’re in a win -lose

00:50:44.119 –> 00:50:46.519
situation. I want to win by not having them talk

00:50:46.519 –> 00:50:50.519
to me. And I’m going to make them lose by just

00:50:50.519 –> 00:50:53.619
doing my job and not worrying about them. But

00:50:53.619 –> 00:50:56.699
how you manage your manager is to use that. You

00:50:56.699 –> 00:51:00.320
want to influence them to do the right things.

00:51:00.840 –> 00:51:03.480
Understand them. Affirm them. Validate what they

00:51:03.480 –> 00:51:07.980
want. Appreciate what they say. Thank you for

00:51:07.980 –> 00:51:10.989
that advice. I appreciate that. even though it

00:51:10.989 –> 00:51:14.329
was a pink slip and a condemnation, say, I appreciate

00:51:14.329 –> 00:51:17.210
your commendation. You got that wrong. I meant

00:51:17.210 –> 00:51:19.630
to condemn you. But you commended me. I’m going

00:51:19.630 –> 00:51:23.389
to do better. It just depends on how you receive

00:51:23.389 –> 00:51:25.510
it. Constructive feedback. You receive it and

00:51:25.510 –> 00:51:27.670
you appreciate and you understand. If it’s an

00:51:27.670 –> 00:51:30.110
offense, like it could be, you know, the circumstance

00:51:30.110 –> 00:51:34.510
is neutral. It could be, you could receive a

00:51:34.510 –> 00:51:37.909
written warning. as constructive feedback or

00:51:37.909 –> 00:51:41.409
as an offense and quit your job immediately because

00:51:41.409 –> 00:51:43.530
obviously this person hates your guts because

00:51:43.530 –> 00:51:46.829
otherwise why would they even give you a warning?

00:51:47.389 –> 00:51:49.269
Constructive feedback, here’s something that

00:51:49.269 –> 00:51:51.030
you can change and if you change it, everything’s

00:51:51.030 –> 00:51:54.469
going to be great again. Ultimatums maybe falls

00:51:54.469 –> 00:51:58.510
under that too. Are ultimatums valid? And there’s

00:51:58.510 –> 00:52:00.670
a relation to wants. So assuming that everything’s

00:52:00.670 –> 00:52:03.190
subjective, so that’s… Question I want to ask,

00:52:03.309 –> 00:52:06.530
are they valid? Can you give an ultimatum appropriately?

00:52:07.429 –> 00:52:10.309
Appropriately. I think ultimatums are kind of

00:52:10.309 –> 00:52:14.849
like a last resort thing. Like I’ve tried all

00:52:14.849 –> 00:52:18.050
of the things that I could to make this thing

00:52:18.050 –> 00:52:22.929
happen or stop happening. And so now I just want

00:52:22.929 –> 00:52:26.469
to give you one last warning. If this thing continues

00:52:26.469 –> 00:52:29.090
to happen or if this thing, you know, depending

00:52:29.090 –> 00:52:34.000
on what it is that you need. In quotes. When

00:52:34.000 –> 00:52:36.980
you issue an ultimatum. Here’s what’s going to

00:52:36.980 –> 00:52:39.820
happen and that’s it. Right. And that’s it. When

00:52:39.820 –> 00:52:42.280
you issue an ultimatum, it means you’re done.

00:52:42.679 –> 00:52:45.199
You’re not going to consider that person anymore.

00:52:45.679 –> 00:52:48.300
Is that what that means? Your way or the highway

00:52:48.300 –> 00:52:51.260
is what it kind of means. Yeah. It’s a win -lose.

00:52:51.980 –> 00:52:54.559
It’s a win -lose idea. What’s the logical end

00:52:54.559 –> 00:52:58.000
to that? I started reading Plato’s The Republic.

00:52:59.639 –> 00:53:03.000
That whole description, it’s coming to the logical

00:53:03.000 –> 00:53:05.780
end. Socratic dialectic, a Socratic discussion

00:53:05.780 –> 00:53:09.139
is to take things to their logical end, is what

00:53:09.139 –> 00:53:12.980
I’m understanding so far anyway. So the logical

00:53:12.980 –> 00:53:16.159
end of making an ultimatum is saying, you’re

00:53:16.159 –> 00:53:19.739
dead to me. Yeah, that’s the logical end. So

00:53:19.739 –> 00:53:22.980
are you saying that ultimatums can’t end in a

00:53:22.980 –> 00:53:25.929
win -win? Right. Right. They’re automatically

00:53:25.929 –> 00:53:27.989
a win -lose because you’re saying you’ve already

00:53:27.989 –> 00:53:30.949
lost, whether you’ve already lost or you’re going

00:53:30.949 –> 00:53:34.190
to lose because I’m making this ultimatum. There’s

00:53:34.190 –> 00:53:37.710
not a way that you can succeed, that they can

00:53:37.710 –> 00:53:40.429
succeed, if you’re telling them you’re on the

00:53:40.429 –> 00:53:46.070
wrong side and you change this or it’s done or

00:53:46.070 –> 00:53:49.269
you can’t eat here anymore. You either stop cursing

00:53:49.269 –> 00:53:51.789
or you leave this restaurant. Yeah, that would

00:53:51.789 –> 00:53:54.940
be an ultimatum. Yeah. And so the person, you

00:53:54.940 –> 00:53:57.639
know, as you say, I’ve warned you three or four

00:53:57.639 –> 00:53:59.619
times, we put you in this corner, we already

00:53:59.619 –> 00:54:02.380
put the noise machines around you. At least could

00:54:02.380 –> 00:54:05.000
you curse underneath the sound of the noise machines?

00:54:05.960 –> 00:54:08.059
But we’ve gone through all of that. So we get

00:54:08.059 –> 00:54:10.659
to the ultimatum. And hopefully you do get to

00:54:10.659 –> 00:54:13.719
go through all those subjective levels first

00:54:13.719 –> 00:54:17.199
before you hit the final ultimatum. It just doesn’t

00:54:17.199 –> 00:54:20.360
make any sense. Yeah, the most dedicated of people

00:54:20.360 –> 00:54:23.860
will spend years. going through whatever they

00:54:23.860 –> 00:54:26.539
can before they feel like they’ve tried every

00:54:26.539 –> 00:54:30.380
single thing. And now it’s ultimatum time. That’s,

00:54:30.380 –> 00:54:32.900
there’s nothing else that I can think of to do.

00:54:33.239 –> 00:54:36.579
Hopefully ultimatums don’t happen in the first

00:54:36.579 –> 00:54:40.940
year of, or in the first days of something. Of

00:54:40.940 –> 00:54:44.300
a relationship. You know, yeah, a business relationship

00:54:44.300 –> 00:54:47.119
or a partnership, a marital relationship or.

00:54:47.869 –> 00:54:49.809
You know, I mean, I could have given my kids

00:54:49.809 –> 00:54:51.949
an ultimatum to stop crying in the middle of

00:54:51.949 –> 00:54:54.449
the night right away. Like I could have said,

00:54:54.530 –> 00:54:56.389
OK, you’re two days old. You should have this

00:54:56.389 –> 00:54:59.449
figured out by now. You know, so either you stop

00:54:59.449 –> 00:55:03.349
crying or I’m done. I’m done with this, you know.

00:55:03.710 –> 00:55:06.449
But I was dedicated. I stuck it through. And

00:55:06.449 –> 00:55:10.489
one of them did take until they were eight to

00:55:10.489 –> 00:55:12.730
stop crying in the middle of the night. But it

00:55:12.730 –> 00:55:16.650
did happen. Yeah. Finally, at some point. I tried

00:55:16.650 –> 00:55:18.949
everything that I could. At some point, you’ll

00:55:18.949 –> 00:55:22.690
stop having a need for chocolate in your house.

00:55:22.949 –> 00:55:27.510
Yeah. Perhaps. Or you could say that it’s never

00:55:27.510 –> 00:55:30.429
going to change. That’s just a want. You’re going

00:55:30.429 –> 00:55:32.070
to maintain the rest of your life, whatever the

00:55:32.070 –> 00:55:34.829
want is. I think once you get to an ultimatum,

00:55:34.829 –> 00:55:39.030
or if you think that is the avenue you have to

00:55:39.030 –> 00:55:41.309
take, I think you’re thinking wrong. I would

00:55:41.309 –> 00:55:43.170
tend to motivate, but how do you understand that?

00:55:43.230 –> 00:55:45.340
So if I want to motivate someone not… want

00:55:45.340 –> 00:55:48.199
to ever do an ultimatum because ultimatums don’t

00:55:48.199 –> 00:55:51.039
work. They’re necessarily that downward spiral.

00:55:51.619 –> 00:55:58.300
You’re saying in that that my pleasure, my value

00:55:58.300 –> 00:56:00.820
is much more than yours and I’m going to devalue

00:56:00.820 –> 00:56:04.460
you entirely and tell you that if you continue

00:56:04.460 –> 00:56:07.380
to do what you do, I’m going to circle it and

00:56:07.380 –> 00:56:09.739
cycle it down. It’s a downward cycle. It’s a

00:56:09.739 –> 00:56:13.019
hedonism. I pleasure my value much more than

00:56:13.019 –> 00:56:16.019
yours. To win -win, you have to always consider

00:56:16.019 –> 00:56:19.480
their subjective wants and desires and needs.

00:56:19.800 –> 00:56:22.260
You have to understand and affirm them and validate

00:56:22.260 –> 00:56:25.980
them and even appreciate where they are. Even

00:56:25.980 –> 00:56:27.599
if it’s something you don’t agree with completely,

00:56:27.900 –> 00:56:29.739
you don’t have to. That’s why I said earlier,

00:56:29.820 –> 00:56:32.420
you said you have to agree to the law. You only

00:56:32.420 –> 00:56:34.420
have to comply to the law. You don’t have to

00:56:34.420 –> 00:56:37.550
agree to it, but you do have to comply. And you

00:56:37.550 –> 00:56:39.530
have to appreciate them enough. If what you want

00:56:39.530 –> 00:56:42.969
is to live within that. Is to have that relationship,

00:56:43.130 –> 00:56:47.409
have that society. So an ultimatum, I believe,

00:56:47.449 –> 00:56:50.289
is never a valid thing to display your needs

00:56:50.289 –> 00:56:52.750
in ultimatums. You display your needs and wants.

00:56:52.829 –> 00:56:55.869
I need this. So that was, let’s move to that

00:56:55.869 –> 00:56:59.809
way of discussing this. Do we state our needs

00:56:59.809 –> 00:57:02.789
or assume they are understood? So when we actually

00:57:02.789 –> 00:57:06.429
have needs. Most of the time, I think we don’t

00:57:06.429 –> 00:57:09.230
state them. Would it be beneficial to state what

00:57:09.230 –> 00:57:11.590
we need from others, a business relationship

00:57:11.590 –> 00:57:15.469
or a partnership or a marriage or friends? Yeah.

00:57:15.630 –> 00:57:21.449
I think it is more useful than not to state them

00:57:21.449 –> 00:57:24.989
clearly. Expectations, your needs, you expect

00:57:24.989 –> 00:57:28.269
that these specific needs will be met. These

00:57:28.269 –> 00:57:31.489
specific wants will eventually be fulfilled.

00:57:31.789 –> 00:57:34.510
I think. I mean, especially if you’re going into

00:57:34.510 –> 00:57:37.510
a marriage, you definitely need to state clearly

00:57:37.510 –> 00:57:40.389
what your wants and your needs are. You can’t

00:57:40.389 –> 00:57:44.570
have that be a surprise. No. Huh? No? When you’re

00:57:44.570 –> 00:57:47.030
going into a marriage, how much time does it

00:57:47.030 –> 00:57:51.170
take to go into a marriage? Even if you’re excessive

00:57:51.170 –> 00:57:53.090
with it. As long as it takes. Even if you’re

00:57:53.090 –> 00:57:55.750
excessive with it, it’s a year or two, maybe

00:57:55.750 –> 00:57:59.289
five. That’s way excessive, though. Most marriages

00:57:59.289 –> 00:58:03.110
are entered into. Very close relations that have

00:58:03.110 –> 00:58:06.969
been going into a marriage for five or longer.

00:58:07.110 –> 00:58:10.550
12 years, maybe something like that. Yeah. Potentially

00:58:10.550 –> 00:58:14.449
much. Yeah. No, I think we’re at, we’ve got to

00:58:14.449 –> 00:58:16.769
be at like eight, eight or nine years. Yeah.

00:58:16.769 –> 00:58:21.449
Whether or not that’s already a marriage, that’s in question.

00:58:22.750 –> 00:58:25.789
No. Okay. What you’re saying is there’s not enough

00:58:25.789 –> 00:58:28.889
time. No, not that there’s not enough time. No

00:58:28.889 –> 00:58:33.710
one. It’s not feasible to answer all your questions

00:58:33.710 –> 00:58:36.190
before you get into marriage. Most of the time

00:58:36.190 –> 00:58:38.650
in a marriage is after you’ve agreed to marry,

00:58:38.809 –> 00:58:41.989
after you’ve been married. Most of the time of

00:58:41.989 –> 00:58:45.489
a marriage is dealt in the years after the wedding.

00:58:45.750 –> 00:58:49.269
That is objectively true. There’s a small piece

00:58:49.269 –> 00:58:51.289
of time that’s before the wedding where you’re

00:58:51.289 –> 00:58:53.909
deciding, should I say yes when he kneels down?

00:58:54.409 –> 00:58:57.260
That’s a very small window. And then once you

00:58:57.260 –> 00:58:59.860
say yes, then you have to start figuring it out.

00:58:59.920 –> 00:59:02.260
And you do have that for the rest of your time.

00:59:02.780 –> 00:59:06.880
Okay. So maybe there’s like some important topics

00:59:06.880 –> 00:59:10.059
to discuss first, but then all the rest of them

00:59:10.059 –> 00:59:12.760
are just not as important as those ones. Like,

00:59:12.760 –> 00:59:16.880
do we want to have a family? And is this the

00:59:16.880 –> 00:59:19.619
kind of relationship where both partners work?

00:59:19.619 –> 00:59:21.579
Where would you like to be married? You know,

00:59:21.599 –> 00:59:27.199
is our religious belief compatible? Is our family

00:59:27.199 –> 00:59:30.800
idea belief compatible? Do you believe that dad

00:59:30.800 –> 00:59:33.500
should be involved in the family or, you know,

00:59:33.500 –> 00:59:36.480
is this a misogynistic relationship you’re looking

00:59:36.480 –> 00:59:40.159
for? Right. There are a few things that are really

00:59:40.159 –> 00:59:44.539
important to make clear. Definitely state your

00:59:44.539 –> 00:59:47.039
needs and wants. Are you really a liar or are

00:59:47.039 –> 00:59:51.739
you just lying to me now? So is it pathological?

00:59:53.070 –> 00:59:55.670
It’s always pathological. We know that. Shut

00:59:55.670 –> 00:59:59.949
up. Right. Right. We are who we are. Do you want

00:59:59.949 –> 01:00:04.929
to lie? What’s your definition of fidelity? And

01:00:04.929 –> 01:00:07.190
we’ll leave it to, you know, marriage experts

01:00:07.190 –> 01:00:12.269
to determine what exactly those things are. But,

01:00:12.269 –> 01:00:15.170
you know, you’ve been married for almost 40 years

01:00:15.170 –> 01:00:17.929
and I’ve been married for almost 20 years. You

01:00:17.929 –> 01:00:20.190
know, that’s 60 years combined. We should know

01:00:20.190 –> 01:00:24.329
everything by now. All we really know is that

01:00:24.329 –> 01:00:29.190
it changes. Every day is a new day. Yeah. I think

01:00:29.190 –> 01:00:32.309
it’s not fair to just assume that somebody can

01:00:32.309 –> 01:00:36.130
guess your needs and your wants correctly. I

01:00:36.130 –> 01:00:39.289
mean, I think perhaps the more history you have,

01:00:39.510 –> 01:00:42.769
the more it is possible that they would correctly

01:00:42.769 –> 01:00:48.670
guess. But it’s like… If you’re expecting someone

01:00:48.670 –> 01:00:55.469
to just know what you need and they guess incorrectly,

01:00:55.710 –> 01:00:57.750
then you’re setting yourself up for kind of a

01:00:57.750 –> 01:01:01.750
disappointment and upset and feeling the need

01:01:01.750 –> 01:01:04.309
to set an ultimatum because you could never get

01:01:04.309 –> 01:01:07.869
it right. And so either you start getting it

01:01:07.869 –> 01:01:11.570
right now or we’re done, you know? And that’s

01:01:11.570 –> 01:01:14.989
an ultimatum. Would that be a boundary too? Are

01:01:14.989 –> 01:01:18.760
boundaries somewhat ultimatums? Yeah. Ultimatums

01:01:18.760 –> 01:01:22.039
are kind of a finality thing, though. Well, it’s

01:01:22.039 –> 01:01:25.360
a final boundary. Yeah. A boundary could be an

01:01:25.360 –> 01:01:29.059
ultimatum, but not ultimatum. No. Yeah. Ultimatums

01:01:29.059 –> 01:01:31.780
are boundaries, maybe, but not all boundaries

01:01:31.780 –> 01:01:34.340
are ultimatums. Right. I think that’s right.

01:01:34.579 –> 01:01:36.860
Because you could say, I really don’t like it

01:01:36.860 –> 01:01:39.219
when you use those words. That’s a boundary.

01:01:39.579 –> 01:01:44.139
I’m going to mention it every time. If you ever…

01:01:44.329 –> 01:01:46.349
talk that way again or speak with me in that

01:01:46.349 –> 01:01:48.309
tone of voice, I’m going to note it. I’ll let

01:01:48.309 –> 01:01:51.789
you know that it upset me. And the ultimatum

01:01:51.789 –> 01:01:55.349
is, if you use that tone of voice to me again,

01:01:55.510 –> 01:02:00.150
then I’m leaving. Something like that. Yes. Then

01:02:00.150 –> 01:02:03.789
I’ll never speak to you again. Yeah. There’s

01:02:03.789 –> 01:02:08.230
an ultimatum boundary here. Or I will cause you

01:02:08.230 –> 01:02:12.119
pain in some other way. The win -win situation,

01:02:12.460 –> 01:02:14.880
though, has to be done by people continuing to

01:02:14.880 –> 01:02:18.420
care about the other’s needs and wants. I think

01:02:18.420 –> 01:02:21.739
we quite often assume that other people understand

01:02:21.739 –> 01:02:24.940
because they’re people. Because we’re all living

01:02:24.940 –> 01:02:29.079
the same experience. Yeah, but it’s a bias. We

01:02:29.079 –> 01:02:32.519
all live in our own biases, and we think that

01:02:32.519 –> 01:02:35.639
other people know what we know. And if they do

01:02:35.639 –> 01:02:39.219
know, that’s the reason we’re trying to discuss

01:02:39.219 –> 01:02:41.340
these things because… We don’t really know

01:02:41.340 –> 01:02:44.360
what other people mean. We don’t even know what

01:02:44.360 –> 01:02:48.820
we ourselves need. That’s another problem is

01:02:48.820 –> 01:02:52.059
you think that you want all of the same things

01:02:52.059 –> 01:02:55.780
that everyone else wants, but what if… Everyone

01:02:55.780 –> 01:02:57.659
else wants… But you think that what you’re

01:02:57.659 –> 01:03:01.039
wanting is appropriate. Yeah. But like what if

01:03:01.039 –> 01:03:02.900
it turns out… And that it’s normal. I think

01:03:02.900 –> 01:03:05.780
I’m wanting normal things until I voice them.

01:03:05.860 –> 01:03:08.579
And then there’s that… You have reticence of

01:03:08.579 –> 01:03:10.639
voicing them because as soon as I voice and say,

01:03:10.739 –> 01:03:15.300
I want to have an iguana. And then everyone’s

01:03:15.300 –> 01:03:19.780
like, what? You have never shown any inkling

01:03:19.780 –> 01:03:25.179
to wanting. Yeah, a lizard. You may think it’s

01:03:25.179 –> 01:03:27.119
normal, but as soon as you say it, then you’re

01:03:27.119 –> 01:03:30.219
vulnerable in the group. And you’re vulnerable

01:03:30.219 –> 01:03:32.980
to their questions, to their needs and wants.

01:03:33.179 –> 01:03:35.780
And then it opens the conversation. And conversations

01:03:35.780 –> 01:03:39.510
can be uncomfortable. At times. So when it gets

01:03:39.510 –> 01:03:41.469
to an uncomfortable level, vulnerability can

01:03:41.469 –> 01:03:43.809
be uncomfortable. But we know that vulnerability

01:03:43.809 –> 01:03:46.690
is the right way. An open conversation is better

01:03:46.690 –> 01:03:49.530
than no conversation. But the no conversation

01:03:49.530 –> 01:03:52.090
usually happens and they say, if you didn’t,

01:03:52.090 –> 01:03:55.070
you have to know what I want because I want common

01:03:55.070 –> 01:03:57.769
things and you want common things. And if I have

01:03:57.769 –> 01:04:02.349
to tell you, then you don’t really want it, do

01:04:02.349 –> 01:04:07.239
you? You must not want common things. You don’t

01:04:07.239 –> 01:04:09.239
know what you want or don’t want unless you converse

01:04:09.239 –> 01:04:11.139
about it, unless you talk about it. You have

01:04:11.139 –> 01:04:14.159
to be open enough to do that rather than saying

01:04:14.159 –> 01:04:19.039
it appears that you don’t want cats, and so I

01:04:19.039 –> 01:04:21.179
can’t talk to you anymore. We’re not going to

01:04:21.179 –> 01:04:24.679
further this engagement because it appeared to

01:04:24.679 –> 01:04:27.760
me you saw that cat or you steered towards that

01:04:27.760 –> 01:04:29.980
cat, and I can’t handle that, so I’m just not

01:04:29.980 –> 01:04:31.800
going to ever talk to you again. Something that

01:04:31.800 –> 01:04:33.539
might have been a good relationship, a good marriage,

01:04:33.679 –> 01:04:36.199
if they’d talked about. what that steering towards

01:04:36.199 –> 01:04:38.880
the cat was in the road, rather than just coming

01:04:38.880 –> 01:04:41.940
up with an ultimatum, that is something I can’t

01:04:41.940 –> 01:04:45.300
deal with and I’m not going to. And so you develop

01:04:45.300 –> 01:04:47.760
in yourself everything that that meant without

01:04:47.760 –> 01:04:50.519
ever discussing it. You can’t be understood if

01:04:50.519 –> 01:04:53.960
you’re not open to converse. It maybe takes the

01:04:53.960 –> 01:04:58.460
responsibility of, it’s in the responsibility

01:04:58.460 –> 01:05:04.050
of both people in a relationship to… What?

01:05:04.530 –> 01:05:07.170
Recognize something that might need open conversation

01:05:07.170 –> 01:05:10.590
about, but then also, like, if you’re seeing

01:05:10.590 –> 01:05:13.289
it in someone else or if you see that they just

01:05:13.289 –> 01:05:15.570
don’t get you, then you’ve got to also bring

01:05:15.570 –> 01:05:18.730
that up too, right? Seek to understand before

01:05:18.730 –> 01:05:22.769
you seek to be understood. You do need to voice

01:05:22.769 –> 01:05:25.789
your wants and needs. If you can identify it

01:05:25.789 –> 01:05:28.230
as a need, a need you’re going to justify, justify

01:05:28.230 –> 01:05:30.789
that I need it because of this. My want is a

01:05:30.789 –> 01:05:34.000
need. And we talked about that. Needs are only

01:05:34.000 –> 01:05:36.880
subservient to wants. I want this, and because

01:05:36.880 –> 01:05:40.239
I want it, I need this. And here’s the reason

01:05:40.239 –> 01:05:42.340
I need it, because if I don’t have that first,

01:05:42.539 –> 01:05:44.639
if I don’t have gloves, I can’t pick up those

01:05:44.639 –> 01:05:47.559
stickery bushes. I need it. I want to pick up

01:05:47.559 –> 01:05:51.280
the bushes, but I can’t do it unless I have gloves.

01:05:52.380 –> 01:05:56.239
Right. And so you need gloves. Yeah. So there’s

01:05:56.239 –> 01:05:58.960
a need, and it’s justified. Needs are always

01:05:58.960 –> 01:06:01.139
justified, but they’re always subservient to

01:06:01.139 –> 01:06:03.409
wants. And maybe you don’t have to pick up those

01:06:03.409 –> 01:06:06.889
bushes. You don’t have to clean that. It’ll die.

01:06:07.010 –> 01:06:08.969
You don’t have to manage the forest. But you’d

01:06:08.969 –> 01:06:11.289
want to. And because you want to, you need certain

01:06:11.289 –> 01:06:14.289
things in order to do it. So we always need certain

01:06:14.289 –> 01:06:18.369
things to do what we want. And if you need psychological

01:06:18.369 –> 01:06:20.369
air, you want to have a relationship with other

01:06:20.369 –> 01:06:22.570
people, you want to live in a community, that

01:06:22.570 –> 01:06:25.190
community has to agree or has to comply with

01:06:25.190 –> 01:06:27.269
each other at least, even if they don’t agree.

01:06:28.489 –> 01:06:32.309
That you have to be open to conversing. You can

01:06:32.309 –> 01:06:35.329
only get to a win -win situation, a fully functioning,

01:06:35.429 –> 01:06:38.469
efficient community or relationship if you’re

01:06:38.469 –> 01:06:41.030
conversing back and forth, if you’re discussing

01:06:41.030 –> 01:06:43.730
what you want. Yeah. And that rolls down to what

01:06:43.730 –> 01:06:46.269
you need. When I was a teenager, I thought I

01:06:46.269 –> 01:06:49.250
was really, really smart. And I kept saying things

01:06:49.250 –> 01:06:52.670
like, it’s all just a miscommunication issue.

01:06:52.769 –> 01:06:55.519
There wasn’t any. There wasn’t enough communication

01:06:55.519 –> 01:06:57.519
around this thing. This is why we’re having an

01:06:57.519 –> 01:07:00.000
issue is because we didn’t communicate enough

01:07:00.000 –> 01:07:03.920
about it. Kind of, kind of is like that though,

01:07:04.000 –> 01:07:06.860
isn’t it? Were you right? It sounds like you

01:07:06.860 –> 01:07:09.739
were right. I feel like I was right. You’re coming

01:07:09.739 –> 01:07:12.940
to the conclusion that what you surmised way

01:07:12.940 –> 01:07:16.559
early in life is appropriate. It’s just, if you

01:07:16.559 –> 01:07:18.800
stop talking, that’s kind of an ultimatum in

01:07:18.800 –> 01:07:21.780
itself. You know, I’m done. Talk to the hand.

01:07:25.430 –> 01:07:28.210
Because the face ain’t listening or something,

01:07:28.389 –> 01:07:32.989
right? Yeah. However that went. But that’s an

01:07:32.989 –> 01:07:35.050
ultimatum. It’s saying no more conversation.

01:07:35.429 –> 01:07:38.550
If you stop a conversation, if you stop the learning,

01:07:38.630 –> 01:07:45.269
and conversation, just that word, it’s an opposition,

01:07:45.570 –> 01:07:48.150
con. You’re talking about two opposite things.

01:07:48.329 –> 01:07:51.130
To converse is both of you have to be involved

01:07:51.130 –> 01:07:54.250
in it. If you converse one way, it’s a lecture

01:07:54.250 –> 01:07:59.289
or it’s a yelling at me or it’s whatever. A one

01:07:59.289 –> 01:08:02.690
-way conversation is not a conversation. That’s

01:08:02.690 –> 01:08:06.750
an oxymoron. One -way conversation. It has to

01:08:06.750 –> 01:08:10.550
be both ways. And it has to have differing wants

01:08:10.550 –> 01:08:13.869
and opinions and views. You can’t have a conversation

01:08:13.869 –> 01:08:17.590
of one side. Yeah, where everyone just agrees

01:08:17.590 –> 01:08:20.649
with everything you say. Yeah, conversation with

01:08:20.649 –> 01:08:23.880
yourself. You can do that. You can bounce back

01:08:23.880 –> 01:08:25.680
and forth, but you have to bounce back and forth

01:08:25.680 –> 01:08:28.340
in a conversation between two ideas. You can’t

01:08:28.340 –> 01:08:32.600
bounce one idea back and forth. So the con-, the conflict

01:08:32.600 –> 01:08:36.880
part of it is there in a conversation, and that’s

01:08:36.880 –> 01:08:39.520
what’s uncomfortable, is there’s a conflict in

01:08:39.520 –> 01:08:42.460
a conversation, and you’re trying to prioritize

01:08:42.460 –> 01:08:47.560
that conflict. Brooke Castillo has one of her

01:08:47.560 –> 01:08:51.260
early episodes. Maybe it’s not early. was want

01:08:51.260 –> 01:08:56.460
match. Have you seen that yet? I maybe have.

01:08:57.140 –> 01:09:00.439
Maybe I haven’t listened to it because I thought

01:09:00.439 –> 01:09:05.060
it wasn’t relevant. I want to relate it here,

01:09:05.159 –> 01:09:07.899
bring it into this conversation. She says, we

01:09:07.899 –> 01:09:10.699
all have things that we want and they’re different.

01:09:10.840 –> 01:09:12.899
They’re all different. That’s what we kind of

01:09:12.899 –> 01:09:15.439
came up with is it’s subjective. But what you

01:09:15.439 –> 01:09:17.520
have to do is display what your wants are to

01:09:17.520 –> 01:09:19.439
the person you’re working with, your partner,

01:09:19.539 –> 01:09:22.449
your… spouse or anyone else, you display what

01:09:22.449 –> 01:09:25.869
you want. And then if there’s a match, then you

01:09:25.869 –> 01:09:27.689
both do it together. That’s the things that you

01:09:27.689 –> 01:09:29.710
do together are those things that you have a

01:09:29.710 –> 01:09:32.229
want match. You’re matching your wants. And hopefully

01:09:32.229 –> 01:09:35.170
you have more of those than not. But if there’s

01:09:35.170 –> 01:09:38.069
something that you want and your spouse doesn’t

01:09:38.069 –> 01:09:41.590
want, then there’s no match. So it’s the match

01:09:41.590 –> 01:09:43.970
you’re looking for. If there’s not a match, then

01:09:43.970 –> 01:09:45.409
you just do it on your own. You’ll find some

01:09:45.409 –> 01:09:47.390
other way to get that done if you still want

01:09:47.390 –> 01:09:49.689
it. Or you can say, you know, I really don’t

01:09:49.689 –> 01:09:52.189
want it that much. So you identify what you want.

01:09:52.609 –> 01:09:54.909
You get to choose, though. That was her whole

01:09:54.909 –> 01:09:58.069
point of that is it’s completely in your control.

01:09:58.510 –> 01:10:01.229
You’re never subservient to someone else’s wants.

01:10:01.710 –> 01:10:03.510
You have to decide if you want it and you have

01:10:03.510 –> 01:10:05.529
to let them decide if they want it. If there’s

01:10:05.529 –> 01:10:07.850
a match, you work together on it. If there’s

01:10:07.850 –> 01:10:10.489
not a match, you work separately. Other ways

01:10:10.489 –> 01:10:15.109
to do it. Other ways to knit. Because, you know,

01:10:15.109 –> 01:10:16.489
you don’t have to do that with someone else.

01:10:16.970 –> 01:10:21.569
Yeah, it would be difficult to be in a relationship

01:10:21.569 –> 01:10:27.010
where if someone, if your partner, you’re like,

01:10:27.050 –> 01:10:29.649
let’s say a company, I don’t know if you could

01:10:29.649 –> 01:10:34.130
do it in a company partnership, but like you

01:10:34.130 –> 01:10:38.069
wanted to advertise on your window glass, like

01:10:38.069 –> 01:10:40.270
you wanted to get a painter to come in and do

01:10:40.270 –> 01:10:43.189
it and they didn’t want it. It’s not a want match,

01:10:43.289 –> 01:10:46.399
but. It would be difficult if they’re like, well,

01:10:46.460 –> 01:10:48.420
I don’t want it. And so we’re not going to do

01:10:48.420 –> 01:10:50.500
it. We’re only going to do the things that both

01:10:50.500 –> 01:10:54.180
of us want. Yeah. Yeah. So if you had a partnership

01:10:54.180 –> 01:10:57.000
with the window and that would be the discussion,

01:10:57.060 –> 01:10:58.720
that’s the conversation. And that’s potentially

01:10:58.720 –> 01:11:00.760
a difficult conversation. Right. But it needs

01:11:00.760 –> 01:11:04.560
to happen. Yeah. You have the conversation. There’s

01:11:04.560 –> 01:11:06.720
going to be justifications for the needs. We

01:11:06.720 –> 01:11:09.140
need to put this on the window because I want

01:11:09.140 –> 01:11:11.609
it on the window. Well, what purpose does it

01:11:11.609 –> 01:11:13.149
serve? You have to talk about those purposes.

01:11:13.529 –> 01:11:16.810
What purposes does a clean window serve for you?

01:11:16.930 –> 01:11:20.069
Why do you not want these images on the window?

01:11:20.229 –> 01:11:21.770
What’s wrong with putting stuff on the window?

01:11:21.850 –> 01:11:24.310
Well, because I need people from the street to

01:11:24.310 –> 01:11:26.090
see we have the lights. The back lighting happens

01:11:26.090 –> 01:11:28.670
in the store. People driving by the street see

01:11:28.670 –> 01:11:30.409
what’s in the store. They can’t see it if they’re

01:11:30.409 –> 01:11:32.649
looking through these advertisements on the window.

01:11:33.010 –> 01:11:36.130
If it doesn’t come to win -win, though, is what

01:11:36.130 –> 01:11:38.569
Brooke Castillo is saying is if you don’t have

01:11:38.569 –> 01:11:42.930
a want match. then you can choose to still do

01:11:42.930 –> 01:11:45.789
it, just do it separately, right? Right. You

01:11:45.789 –> 01:11:48.810
exit that. That partnership ends. You get one

01:11:48.810 –> 01:11:51.470
store and you just split up for business. But

01:11:51.470 –> 01:11:54.869
could you do it still together, though? Could

01:11:54.869 –> 01:11:56.729
you say, all right, we won’t use the business

01:11:56.729 –> 01:11:59.609
funds for this advertisement. I’m going to go

01:11:59.609 –> 01:12:01.989
and sell lemonade, and then I’m going to pay

01:12:01.989 –> 01:12:06.079
for the window stuff or something. I’m not going

01:12:06.079 –> 01:12:07.840
to, I’m not going to paint the windows. I’ll,

01:12:07.840 –> 01:12:09.680
I’ll buy a piece of glass and put it up against

01:12:09.680 –> 01:12:12.460
the wall. And, but that, I mean, that kind of

01:12:12.460 –> 01:12:14.840
does turn into a win -win though. Yeah. We’ll

01:12:14.840 –> 01:12:17.340
put a mural next to it. So yeah. And you do have,

01:12:17.340 –> 01:12:19.159
you come, come up with a win -win if you want

01:12:19.159 –> 01:12:21.859
to stay in business with each other. What Brooke

01:12:21.859 –> 01:12:25.020
was talking about was, you know, in a, in a marital

01:12:25.020 –> 01:12:28.680
relationship, you can choose to divorce that

01:12:28.680 –> 01:12:31.329
relationship. That’s a valid choice you have

01:12:31.329 –> 01:12:33.989
that you can make based on your want match. If

01:12:33.989 –> 01:12:36.189
you determine there’s just so many things that

01:12:36.189 –> 01:12:39.149
we’re not matching on our wants, then that relationship

01:12:39.149 –> 01:12:42.430
doesn’t have to supersede, doesn’t have to stay.

01:12:42.689 –> 01:12:45.109
I think she pointed that out almost directly.

01:12:45.590 –> 01:12:49.329
And consequently, in her personal life, she decided

01:12:49.329 –> 01:12:51.949
that was an option for her. This was before her

01:12:51.949 –> 01:12:53.850
kids were out of school and on college. And as

01:12:53.850 –> 01:12:55.109
soon as they went to college and they’re all

01:12:55.109 –> 01:12:57.930
independent, her two kids, she’s no longer married.

01:12:58.300 –> 01:13:01.220
She was speaking from a base of understanding

01:13:01.220 –> 01:13:04.319
with that, like in all of her life. I’m sure

01:13:04.319 –> 01:13:07.279
she talks about truth and life the way she’s

01:13:07.279 –> 01:13:10.800
living it. Like how we choose our topics for

01:13:10.800 –> 01:13:13.560
what we’re going to talk about. This is all relevant

01:13:13.560 –> 01:13:16.539
to our personal lives. This is stuff we’re working

01:13:16.539 –> 01:13:19.000
with and that everyone is working with all the

01:13:19.000 –> 01:13:23.500
time. We’re not talking about pink elephants.

01:13:23.819 –> 01:13:25.840
We’re talking about things that actually exist.

01:13:26.439 –> 01:13:28.880
So you have your choices to make based on what

01:13:28.880 –> 01:13:30.920
the other person wants. But in order to determine

01:13:30.920 –> 01:13:33.659
that, you have to be open to the discussion.

01:13:33.899 –> 01:13:35.960
You have to be looking for the win -win. And

01:13:35.960 –> 01:13:39.020
there’s always places to go. You know, there’s

01:13:39.020 –> 01:13:41.859
two or three different ways, at least, to do

01:13:41.859 –> 01:13:45.680
anything. You just have to go to those, get to

01:13:45.680 –> 01:13:51.000
that level. And where, what is step six, or what

01:13:51.000 –> 01:13:53.899
are these called in seven habits? Habit six is

01:13:53.899 –> 01:13:57.079
synergy. By discussing it, by looking for the

01:13:57.079 –> 01:14:01.260
win -win in step five, I think it is, by looking

01:14:01.260 –> 01:14:06.319
for the win -win, you do get to synergy. Win

01:14:06.319 –> 01:14:09.060
-win is four. Five is understanding. So thinking

01:14:09.060 –> 01:14:10.979
win -win means you have to understand. So then

01:14:10.979 –> 01:14:13.220
you seek to understand with step five. No, step

01:14:13.220 –> 01:14:17.039
six, you benefit from the synergy. Things come

01:14:17.039 –> 01:14:19.319
up that neither of you brought to the table.

01:14:19.380 –> 01:14:22.460
But because you’re willing to think win -win,

01:14:22.460 –> 01:14:25.199
willing to converse, Open the conversation and

01:14:25.199 –> 01:14:27.460
keep it going. You’re willing to try to understand

01:14:27.460 –> 01:14:29.359
the other person and rephrase what they just

01:14:29.359 –> 01:14:33.119
said so that it’s understood clearly and affirmed

01:14:33.119 –> 01:14:36.659
and validated and appreciated. The synergy will

01:14:36.659 –> 01:14:40.039
happen. New avenues will open up that you never

01:14:40.039 –> 01:14:42.739
thought of, you hadn’t thought of yet. But the

01:14:42.739 –> 01:14:45.680
thoughts come, the inspiration comes, the intuition

01:14:45.680 –> 01:14:49.180
comes. Yeah. And I imagine sometimes it could

01:14:49.180 –> 01:14:52.000
take a lot of dedication and sticking through

01:14:52.000 –> 01:14:56.750
it -ness. to get to that synergistic point because

01:14:56.750 –> 01:14:58.390
it’s not always going to happen in the first

01:14:58.390 –> 01:15:00.649
five minutes of saying, okay, neither of these

01:15:00.649 –> 01:15:02.470
choices are okay. Let’s find something else.

01:15:02.810 –> 01:15:06.390
Maybe with more practice it could, but… You’re

01:15:06.390 –> 01:15:08.189
not even necessarily looking for another choice.

01:15:08.449 –> 01:15:11.689
It may be one of those two, but you don’t have

01:15:11.689 –> 01:15:14.850
the right feel to it yet. And that’s the way

01:15:14.850 –> 01:15:18.409
it’s been described too, unity. And it really

01:15:18.409 –> 01:15:21.729
is a unifying thing. A want match is a unity.

01:15:22.220 –> 01:15:24.020
You have to have a unity in what you’re doing.

01:15:24.380 –> 01:15:28.840
So if you’re not unified on the same page, understanding

01:15:28.840 –> 01:15:30.800
the same page, understanding it the same way,

01:15:30.880 –> 01:15:32.939
and you can’t get to that without having the

01:15:32.939 –> 01:15:35.720
conversation about it. And it’s the synergistic

01:15:35.720 –> 01:15:38.000
points that say, you know, I didn’t realize this.

01:15:38.000 –> 01:15:40.279
And she says, I didn’t realize this either. Both

01:15:40.279 –> 01:15:42.060
of you are realizing something new. And all of

01:15:42.060 –> 01:15:44.939
a sudden now the page changed and it became more

01:15:44.939 –> 01:15:47.420
descriptive. And so now you’re on the same page

01:15:47.420 –> 01:15:50.479
because. You’re not on these two disparate pages

01:15:50.479 –> 01:15:53.579
that you were thinking before. The page morphed

01:15:53.579 –> 01:15:55.979
into something that now you both understand and

01:15:55.979 –> 01:15:59.600
agree to fully. And you have a unity. And because

01:15:59.600 –> 01:16:02.100
you have a unity, you can step forward and actually

01:16:02.100 –> 01:16:06.739
get married this time or whatever. I wonder if

01:16:06.739 –> 01:16:11.380
this is a mortality issue. Is this something

01:16:11.380 –> 01:16:14.609
once you become… An immortal being, afterlife,

01:16:14.949 –> 01:16:18.350
and everyone’s eternal. Will we have the ability

01:16:18.350 –> 01:16:22.329
to just know each other’s hearts and know automatically

01:16:22.329 –> 01:16:25.670
what the best path forward is without having

01:16:25.670 –> 01:16:28.789
to converse for hundreds of years about the problem?

01:16:29.229 –> 01:16:32.409
Or thousands of years? A thousand years? Hundreds

01:16:32.409 –> 01:16:35.869
of years being ten hundreds? Calling it a millennium?

01:16:36.449 –> 01:16:40.149
Calling it a millennium and saying, if… Okay,

01:16:40.149 –> 01:16:42.609
so you’re proposing that as a proposal that that

01:16:42.609 –> 01:16:45.369
exists, and let’s say it exists, that there is

01:16:45.369 –> 01:16:49.189
an eternity, there is a continuation. We are

01:16:49.189 –> 01:16:52.430
already in it. The ethereal spirit that we hold

01:16:52.430 –> 01:16:55.350
is already there. We talked about that in telepathy

01:16:55.350 –> 01:16:58.649
a few episodes back. We have that ability to

01:16:58.649 –> 01:17:01.630
understand fully without using words. We just

01:17:01.630 –> 01:17:03.880
haven’t developed it. And there are people who

01:17:03.880 –> 01:17:05.520
have developed it. And those people that have

01:17:05.520 –> 01:17:08.340
developed it before needs, they had needs. So

01:17:08.340 –> 01:17:12.000
a autistic person that’s nonverbal has a need

01:17:12.000 –> 01:17:16.340
to telepathically communicate. And from what

01:17:16.340 –> 01:17:17.739
you were saying, what we talked about before,

01:17:17.840 –> 01:17:21.380
they developed that ability. And so we can have

01:17:21.380 –> 01:17:23.579
that ability and it may take a thousand years.

01:17:23.640 –> 01:17:28.140
Maybe we can do it right now fully, but maybe

01:17:28.140 –> 01:17:31.710
it’ll take time to learn it. to not have to converse,

01:17:31.750 –> 01:17:34.109
not have to have those conversations back and

01:17:34.109 –> 01:17:35.970
forth, but maybe it just takes enough practice

01:17:35.970 –> 01:17:40.189
in the conversation to open up our minds to telepathically

01:17:40.189 –> 01:17:43.430
understand the other person, our spirits to connect.

01:17:43.689 –> 01:17:46.630
So eternally, the one phrase I think was the

01:17:46.630 –> 01:17:48.409
biggest one we took out of that immortal and

01:17:48.409 –> 01:17:51.829
eternal discussion was that you don’t have animosity

01:17:51.829 –> 01:17:56.229
in heaven or in the heaven you’re going to. You’re

01:17:56.229 –> 01:17:59.659
not going to be… Because you know. The hearts

01:17:59.659 –> 01:18:02.340
of everyone. You know and you care enough about

01:18:02.340 –> 01:18:04.199
everyone. It’s a win -win. You know it’s a win

01:18:04.199 –> 01:18:05.800
-win and you’re going to be on that level all

01:18:05.800 –> 01:18:08.060
the time. Understanding and appreciating their

01:18:08.060 –> 01:18:10.399
position as opposed to saying, I understand and

01:18:10.399 –> 01:18:12.159
appreciate mine and I’m hedonistically going

01:18:12.159 –> 01:18:15.399
to say yours is wrong. Yours isn’t wrong. Yours

01:18:15.399 –> 01:18:18.720
is just yours and mine is mine. And that’s where

01:18:18.720 –> 01:18:21.079
we are right now. Right now we’re in a time -delayed,

01:18:21.140 –> 01:18:24.979
delineated life. And as you’re living time to

01:18:24.979 –> 01:18:27.380
time, minute to minute, hour to hour. You’re

01:18:27.380 –> 01:18:29.659
changing as you go. And so the conversation has

01:18:29.659 –> 01:18:33.340
to change with you. But if you live in an omnipresent

01:18:33.340 –> 01:18:36.680
life, in an eternity, in an eternal scheme where

01:18:36.680 –> 01:18:39.159
there’s no today, yesterday, or forever, it’s

01:18:39.159 –> 01:18:43.199
all just now, eternal now, then you do have,

01:18:43.340 –> 01:18:45.739
that’s the omniscience has to happen at the same

01:18:45.739 –> 01:18:48.939
time as omnipresence. And the conversation loses

01:18:48.939 –> 01:18:53.239
its value because you know. other people, you,

01:18:53.319 –> 01:18:56.439
you, you value them appropriately. You can prioritize.

01:18:56.579 –> 01:18:58.939
I don’t know if you prioritize them. Are there

01:18:58.939 –> 01:19:00.859
priorities in heaven? That’d be another discussion

01:19:00.859 –> 01:19:06.340
to have. If, because we can only prioritize if

01:19:06.340 –> 01:19:09.199
we feel like there is a lower priority, you know,

01:19:09.199 –> 01:19:10.960
I could do these five things. I’m going to do

01:19:10.960 –> 01:19:13.720
this one thing at top or maybe these three, but

01:19:13.720 –> 01:19:16.260
these last four, I’m not going to touch ever

01:19:16.260 –> 01:19:19.880
because I prioritize them way low. So where do

01:19:19.880 –> 01:19:22.260
we come to? All needs and wants are subjective.

01:19:22.800 –> 01:19:27.279
And we have to agree in order to deal with people

01:19:27.279 –> 01:19:30.199
that their wants and needs are subjective also.

01:19:30.539 –> 01:19:33.340
And in a relationship, any relationship and every

01:19:33.340 –> 01:19:35.720
relationship you hold, we’re talking back and

01:19:35.720 –> 01:19:38.579
forth. We have to converse with a win -win attitude

01:19:38.579 –> 01:19:41.319
that we’re looking for the best that they have,

01:19:41.539 –> 01:19:43.819
giving them psychological air, allowing them

01:19:43.819 –> 01:19:46.840
your psychological air, letting our needs be

01:19:46.840 –> 01:19:49.800
met in conversation. Until we identify where

01:19:49.800 –> 01:19:52.680
the want matches are, where our unities identify.

01:19:53.340 –> 01:19:55.439
And those people you’re unified with, you work

01:19:55.439 –> 01:19:58.460
with. Those people you have no unity with, there’s

01:19:58.460 –> 01:20:01.520
no reason to kick against the pricks. That’s

01:20:01.520 –> 01:20:04.739
a biblical statement. To battle. To stay in a

01:20:04.739 –> 01:20:07.159
battle with somebody. And you have the choice.

01:20:07.319 –> 01:20:09.939
You can choose to open a business with that individual

01:20:09.939 –> 01:20:13.520
or to do business with that system or not. Or

01:20:13.520 –> 01:20:16.000
to say, you know, I’m just not going to do business

01:20:16.000 –> 01:20:19.560
with that system because… I don’t agree with

01:20:19.560 –> 01:20:22.159
enough things. There’s not enough of a want match

01:20:22.159 –> 01:20:24.819
that I want their product and they want my service.

01:20:25.140 –> 01:20:29.420
I believe all of my notes are discussed, kind

01:20:29.420 –> 01:20:31.779
of. Is there anything that’s been left unsaid?

01:20:32.079 –> 01:20:34.779
One other word that I didn’t touch on is trust.

01:20:35.119 –> 01:20:37.340
And that probably has to do with ultimatums.

01:20:37.479 –> 01:20:40.300
You can issue an ultimatum to someone that you

01:20:40.300 –> 01:20:45.020
don’t trust. It’s probably you have to not trust

01:20:45.020 –> 01:20:48.430
them to issue the ultimatum. to give an ultimatum

01:20:48.430 –> 01:20:51.470
and trust. And that’s where that word came out

01:20:51.470 –> 01:20:54.350
of this Stephen Covey description of the win

01:20:54.350 –> 01:20:57.489
-win too. It says you can try to build the trust

01:20:57.489 –> 01:21:00.949
bank, your emotional bank. He calls it empathic

01:21:00.949 –> 01:21:02.850
listening. By empathic listening, you give psychological

01:21:02.850 –> 01:21:05.909
air. You’re building the emotional bank of someone

01:21:05.909 –> 01:21:09.409
else and building trust. You can try to fund

01:21:09.409 –> 01:21:11.289
that, but if the person isn’t willing to receive

01:21:11.289 –> 01:21:13.989
it, then it doesn’t matter how well you think

01:21:13.989 –> 01:21:17.020
you did. Nothing you do is a deposit unless the

01:21:17.020 –> 01:21:19.960
other person perceives it as such. So you could

01:21:19.960 –> 01:21:21.880
do things, but they could still say, that’s just

01:21:21.880 –> 01:21:24.340
manipulation. You’re just trying to technique

01:21:24.340 –> 01:21:27.520
me into this. And I’m not going to allow that.

01:21:27.840 –> 01:21:29.659
The other person has to be open to it as well.

01:21:29.739 –> 01:21:32.439
That’s the other side of win -win. You can’t

01:21:32.439 –> 01:21:34.239
win -win if you have someone with a lose on the

01:21:34.239 –> 01:21:37.439
other side. Says, you’re just trying to win and

01:21:37.439 –> 01:21:40.520
I don’t want you to win. I’m going to make sure

01:21:40.520 –> 01:21:43.359
you lose. So it has to be both ways. Two people

01:21:43.359 –> 01:21:46.880
have to do it. You can’t give trust to somebody.

01:21:47.359 –> 01:21:49.760
You can’t say, trust me, and it actually means

01:21:49.760 –> 01:21:52.920
anything. I want you to trust me. That means

01:21:52.920 –> 01:21:55.260
nothing. That means nothing. The other person

01:21:55.260 –> 01:22:00.600
has to receive the trust, and you both have to

01:22:00.600 –> 01:22:03.180
want it, a mutual trust, and that’s the unity

01:22:03.180 –> 01:22:05.920
too. I think trust has exactly the same thing

01:22:05.920 –> 01:22:08.239
to do with your wants and your needs. You have

01:22:08.239 –> 01:22:10.890
to be open to allowing the other person. To do

01:22:10.890 –> 01:22:13.029
what they do. So did it all close out in your

01:22:13.029 –> 01:22:15.710
mind? What else do you have that anything else

01:22:15.710 –> 01:22:19.130
that wasn’t finalized? I don’t think that there’s

01:22:19.130 –> 01:22:23.170
anything left dangling. Okay. We snipped it all

01:22:23.170 –> 01:22:27.270
off. There’s no participles out there or polyps.

01:22:28.710 –> 01:22:33.869
Yeah. And I mean, I still, as usual, I still

01:22:33.869 –> 01:22:36.810
feel like there could still be more if we sit

01:22:36.810 –> 01:22:39.760
in silence long enough. then we’ll find something

01:22:39.760 –> 01:22:42.800
else about this that needs to be approached.

01:22:43.359 –> 01:22:46.859
Included? Yeah. I don’t have the time to sit

01:22:46.859 –> 01:22:53.340
in silence at this minute anymore. We’ve discussed

01:22:53.340 –> 01:22:55.619
long enough and we came to some fairly good conclusions.

01:22:56.020 –> 01:22:59.279
[outro] Let me just close this by saying to you, thanks

01:22:59.279 –> 01:23:01.619
for conversing with me because that’s important.

01:23:01.960 –> 01:23:04.699
And we discussed why it’s important today. and

01:23:04.699 –> 01:23:07.380
why that conversation needs to happen, even if

01:23:07.380 –> 01:23:09.100
there’s some opposing views and I have to say

01:23:09.100 –> 01:23:11.079
no and you have to say no at times. We all have

01:23:11.079 –> 01:23:13.319
to do that. And so everyone else listening to

01:23:13.319 –> 01:23:15.859
this podcast, hopefully you’ve had some concern

01:23:15.859 –> 01:23:18.279
with some of the things we’ve said, some conflict,

01:23:18.500 –> 01:23:21.779
some ideas that are different that you say, you

01:23:21.779 –> 01:23:24.119
guys just didn’t consider that fully. Let us

01:23:24.119 –> 01:23:27.359
know, please. You can get with us. It’s doyouhaveaminutepodcast.com

01:23:27.359 –> 01:23:30.399
is the webpage. It has all these on there

01:23:30.399 –> 01:23:32.359
and a place for you to make comments. And so

01:23:32.359 –> 01:23:36.029
do that. Call our phone number. You’ll find us.

01:23:36.409 –> 01:23:40.050
Comment on our YouTube videos. The YouTube videos,

01:23:40.189 –> 01:23:45.670
we’ll respond to those for sure. Right. Assuming

01:23:45.670 –> 01:23:48.050
that we see it. The YouTube channel is becoming

01:23:48.050 –> 01:23:51.670
fairly popular. And so it needs to definitely

01:23:51.670 –> 01:23:54.710
find the platform you will watch on and then

01:23:54.710 –> 01:23:56.409
continue in this conversation with us. That’s

01:23:56.409 –> 01:23:58.729
the intent is that you continue week to week.

01:23:58.829 –> 01:24:01.489
So what are we discussing next week? Is next

01:24:01.489 –> 01:24:04.569
week idioms, I believe? Yeah, and next time,

01:24:04.630 –> 01:24:08.449
I think this is a good time to say we have stepped

01:24:08.449 –> 01:24:12.210
back. We’ve slowed down our process, and now

01:24:12.210 –> 01:24:15.069
we’re doing conversations every two weeks. So

01:24:15.069 –> 01:24:18.170
in a couple of weeks, we’ll be talking about

01:24:18.170 –> 01:24:21.970
idioms, yes, and the language that we use to

01:24:21.970 –> 01:24:26.569
describe the real life around us, you know, yeah.

01:24:26.829 –> 01:24:29.649
Right, and how we indicate our wants based on

01:24:29.649 –> 01:24:33.909
the idiom we use, things like that. yep have

01:24:33.909 –> 01:24:37.250
a great day appreciate your time good night good

01:24:37.250 –> 01:24:37.449
night

Jump to top

Leave a comment